Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Berger, Nicolas

  • Google
  • 4
  • 14
  • 67

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2021Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Carbohydrate and Menthol Mouth-Swilling Solutions: A Repeated Measures Cross-Over Preliminary Trial5citations
  • 2020Lab and field vo2peak testing in highly trained cyclistscitations
  • 2017Cohesive strength of iron ore granules1citations
  • 2015Scaling behaviour of cohesive granular flows61citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Maulder, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Best, Russ
1 / 1 shared
Smith, Phillip
1 / 1 shared
Loo, Frédéric Van
1 / 1 shared
Delenne, Jean-Yves
1 / 34 shared
Pellenq, Roland
1 / 4 shared
Azema, Emilien
1 / 1 shared
Radjai, Farhang
2 / 32 shared
Koltsov, Alexey
1 / 7 shared
Izard, Edouard
1 / 2 shared
Douce, Jean-François
2 / 2 shared
Contreras, Rafael Jaimes
1 / 1 shared
Nezamabadi, Saeid
1 / 12 shared
Azéma, Émilien
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2017
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Maulder, Peter
  • Best, Russ
  • Smith, Phillip
  • Loo, Frédéric Van
  • Delenne, Jean-Yves
  • Pellenq, Roland
  • Azema, Emilien
  • Radjai, Farhang
  • Koltsov, Alexey
  • Izard, Edouard
  • Douce, Jean-François
  • Contreras, Rafael Jaimes
  • Nezamabadi, Saeid
  • Azéma, Émilien
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Lab and field vo2peak testing in highly trained cyclists

  • Berger, Nicolas
  • Smith, Phillip
Abstract

The issues with traditional maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) testing include an inability to regulate intensity due to fixed resistance and a lack of conscious decision making during the test (Noakes, 2008). Depending on the test and conditions, some athletes do not reach V̇O2max despite reaching volitional exhaustion, and in this case, the result is recorded as the highest, or peak oxygen uptake attained in this test, known as V̇O2peak. To investigate this, a studywas conducted to determineif a field-based test would result in a higher V̇O2peakvalue than a lab-based test. Twelve highly trained cyclists performed a 20w/minute ramp test on a cycle ergometer and a 3.2km hill climb on their own racing bike wearing a portable gas analyser (MetaMax 3b, Cortex GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). A paired t-test revealed that the hill climb resulted in a higher but not statistically significant absolute V̇O2peak: lab 5.49 ±0.8L·min-1vs.field5.59± 0.7L·min-1,p=.189andrelative V̇O2peak:lab71.9± 10.0 ml·kg-1·min-1vs. field 74.0 ± 9.9 ml·kg-1·min-1, p = .060. Additionally, field testing resulted in a significantly higher RERmax: lab 1.07 ± 0.0 vs. field 1.16 ± 0.1, p = .019,end lactate: lab 9.24 ± 1.6 mmol·L-1vs. field 11.99 ± 2.3 mmol·L-1, p = .039, and 5-minute-post lactate: lab 7.56 ± 1.4 mmol·L-1vs. field 11.87 ± 2.0 mmol·L-1, p < 0.001. There was no difference in HRmaxbetween tests: lab 187.9 ± 11.6 b·min-1vs.field187.6 ± 10.6 b·min-1, p = .952. Slightly higher V̇O2peakvalues recorded during the field test may be explained by the closed-loopformatallowingriderstopacetheireffortbetter,thecoolingeffectofthewind outdoors,freedomtorideout-the-saddle (leadingtogreatermusclerecruitment),or perhaps the sub-optimal length of the lab test 20.4 ± 3.0 mins vs 8.4 ± 1.2 mins field test. Findingssuggesttheincreasedecologicalvalidityoffieldtestingledtohigher(butnot statistically significant) V̇O2peakvalues and can be considered a viable alternative to lab-based testing if a climb with suitable length and gradient is available

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Oxygen