| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Palola, Sarianna
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024Durability and Functionality of Conventional Polymeric Packaging Materials in Reusable Packaging Systems
- 2022Fiber Resizing, Compounding and Validationcitations
- 2022Examining interfacial interactions in a range of polymers using poly(ethylene oxide) functionalized carbon fiberscitations
- 2022Towards Sustainable Composite Manufacturing with Recycled Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Compositescitations
- 2022Mixed Surface Chemistry on Carbon Fibers to Promote Adhesion in Epoxy and PMMA Polymerscitations
- 2022Comparison of interlaminar and interfacial shear strength with recycled carbon fiber
- 2021Adiabatic heating and damage onset in a pultruded glass fiber reinforced composite under compressive loading at different strain rates.citations
- 2021Adiabatic heating and damage onset in a pultruded glass fiber reinforced composite under compressive loading at different strain rates.citations
- 2021One surface treatment, multiple possibilities : Broadening the use‐potential of para‐aramid fibers with mechanical adhesioncitations
- 2021One surface treatment, multiple possibilitiescitations
- 2021One Surface Treatment, Multiple Possibilities: Broadening the Use-Potential of Para-Aramid Fibers with Mechanical Adhesioncitations
- 2020Development in Additive Methods in Aramid Fiber Surface Modification to Increase Fiber-Matrix Adhesion: A Reviewcitations
- 2020Examining interfacial interactions in a range of polymers using poly(ethylene oxide) functionalized carbon fiberscitations
- 2020Development in additive methods in aramid fiber surface modification to increase fiber-matrix adhesioncitations
- 2020Resizing approach to increase the viability of recycled fibre-reinforced compositescitations
- 2020Resizing Approach to Increase the Viability of Recycled Fibre-Reinforced Compositescitations
- 2019Properties of pyrolytically recycled carbon fibers and their re-use in composites
- 2019DLC-treated aramid-fibre composites: Tailoring nanoscale-coating for macroscale performancecitations
- 2019Perspectives on the industrial implementation of novel microwave assisted surface modification method for aramid fibers
- 2017Microwave induced hierarchical nanostructures on aramid fibers and their influence on adhesion properties in a rubber matrixcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Comparison of interlaminar and interfacial shear strength with recycled carbon fiber
Abstract
Testing the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of composites using a short beam shear (SBS) test takes time. Micro-scale interfacial shear strength values (IFSS) need to be scaled back to the macro-level if a more reliable picture of the composite behavior on the right scale is desired. Here, the objective is to find out what kind of relation the ILSS and the IFSS values have <br/>for recycled carbon fibers (rCF) and epoxy matrix. Factors affecting the reliability of both tests are considered. <br/>A slope-based method was used to obtain the IFSS values from the micro-scale results. The microbond test gave a 43.6 MPa IFSS value and the SBS test a 36.4 MPa ILSS value. There were a lot of variables associated with the SBS for rCF, due to which there is uncertainty in the results. <br/>The data from the microbond tests were more reliable due to the high sampling volume.