People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Thomsen, Mette Hedegaard
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (9/9 displayed)
- 2022Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstockcitations
- 2022Biohydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Utilizing Organic Residue Feedstock:A Reviewcitations
- 2022Importance of the Multiple Lines of Evidence (MLOE) approach in Diagnosing Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC)
- 2021The Clean Biocide Project Halophilic plant extracts for prevention of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC)
- 2021The CLEAN BIOCIDE project: Halophilic plant extracts as natural corrosion inhibitors and biocides for oil field application
- 2021The CLEAN BIOCIDE project: Halophilic plant extracts as natural corrosion inhibitors and biocides for oil field application
- 2021Clean Biocide Project: Natural Corrosion Inhibitors Halophilic Plant Extracts for Biofilm Mitigation
- 2017Application of natural antimicrobial compounds for reservoir souring and MIC prevention in offshore oil and gas production systems
- 2015Seawater as Alternative to Freshwater in Pretreatment of Date Palm Residues for Bioethanol Production in Coastal and/or Arid Areascitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Importance of the Multiple Lines of Evidence (MLOE) approach in Diagnosing Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC)
Abstract
Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is a problem in the oil and gas industry and many other water sectors. However, improper diagnosis of MIC is common, and the fallout of a misdiagnosis can be expensive. Biocides and pigging could be used when they aren’t needed, or MIC is not diagnosed, increasing severity and mitigation costs in the future.<br/>MIC does not have a single defining characteristic. However, in the industry, MIC is sometimes diagnosed based on a few or a single variable. Commonly, the presence of a specific species of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) water or the presence of pitting on coupons [1]. However, MIC can be caused by other microorganisms and doesn’t necessarily cause pitting. Conversely, the presence of SRB doesn’t necessarily cause MIC on its own, and other mechanisms exist that cause pitting corrosion.<br/>In the laboratory, a biofilm reactor was used to test the efficacy of a halophyte-based biocide against a mixed microbial culture. The biocide was added after 3 weeks, but after one week, the microbial community adapted, and the continuously monitored H2S increased to pre-biocide-exposure levels. However, no new pitting corrosion occurred after the biocide exposure – was this MIC?<br/>Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, H2S concentration, coupon surface topography, and coupon weight loss, this poster presentation highlights the importance of the Multiple Lines of Evidence (MLOE) approach in diagnosing MIC.<br/><br/>[1] A. A. Abilio, J. Wolodko, R. B. Eckert, and T. L. Skovhus, “Review and Gap Analysis of MIC Failure Investigation Methods in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Sector,” in Failure analysis of microbiologically influenced corrosion, 1st ed., R. B. Eckert and T. L. Skovhus, Eds. CRC Press, 2021, pp. 25–66.