People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Correia, Andre
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (8/8 displayed)
- 2023Graphene as polymethylmetacrylate reinforcement material
- 2023Prototype of a standardized and controlled polishing tool for dental materials
- 2022Investigation of the effect of the same polishing protocol on the surface roughness of denture base acrylic resinscitations
- 2018Clinical performance of CAD/CAM tooth-supported ceramic restorationscitations
- 2017EVALUATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DENTAL COMPOSITES SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINISHING AND POLISHING
- 2017Evaluation of surface roughness of dental composites subject to different methods of finish and polishing
- 2016Resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis with a modified treatment surface in a zirconia framework: a case report
- 2016Resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis with a modified treatment surface in a zirconia framework
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
EVALUATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DENTAL COMPOSITES SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINISHING AND POLISHING
Abstract
This research compares the effect of different rotary instruments for finishing (tungsten carbide laminated drill or diamond drill) on composite restorations and on the interface between enamel and composite. The composite resins used were HRi (R) (Micerium)-nanoparticle dental resin and Synergy (R) D6 (Coltene) nanohybrid resin. Surface roughness was evaluated using optical profilometry and studied with SensoScan software 5.3 (SensoTech, S.L.). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software (v.23) to identify significant differences on the roughness surface on finishing and polishing procedures.