Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Caria, Giovanni

  • Google
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021PIEGEAge des Composés Halogénés Lipophiles Organiques Rémanents (PIEGEACHLOR)citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Slezack, S.
1 / 1 shared
Piutti, Séverine
1 / 1 shared
Simon, Nadège Laure
1 / 1 shared
Demont-Caulet, Nathalie
1 / 1 shared
Feidt, Cyril
1 / 1 shared
Marot, Franck
1 / 1 shared
Mougin, Christian
1 / 1 shared
Cheviron, Nathalie
1 / 1 shared
Caldas, Thérèse De
1 / 1 shared
Woignier, Thierry
1 / 14 shared
Delannoy, Matthieu
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Slezack, S.
  • Piutti, Séverine
  • Simon, Nadège Laure
  • Demont-Caulet, Nathalie
  • Feidt, Cyril
  • Marot, Franck
  • Mougin, Christian
  • Cheviron, Nathalie
  • Caldas, Thérèse De
  • Woignier, Thierry
  • Delannoy, Matthieu
OrganizationsLocationPeople

report

PIEGEAge des Composés Halogénés Lipophiles Organiques Rémanents (PIEGEACHLOR)

  • Slezack, S.
  • Piutti, Séverine
  • Simon, Nadège Laure
  • Demont-Caulet, Nathalie
  • Feidt, Cyril
  • Marot, Franck
  • Mougin, Christian
  • Caria, Giovanni
  • Cheviron, Nathalie
  • Caldas, Thérèse De
  • Woignier, Thierry
  • Delannoy, Matthieu
Abstract

The objective of the Piegeachlor project is to reduce the availability of several families of organochlorine contaminants found in soils. The selected contaminants are polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins and furans, as well as chlordecone. The initial hypothesis of the project was that carbonaceous matrices resulting from pyrolysis of woody plants such as biochars could play a role of sequestration for this purpose. Following preliminary tests, it turned out that these matrices had on the one hand rather similar characteristics and this in spite of the mobilization of ligneous of different origin and the use of 2 temperatures of pyrolysis (500 and 700°C) and on the other hand a very limited capacity of retention. New carbonaceous matrices were then introduced, in particular activated carbons. The latter could not be produced by the industrial partner and were purchased commercially but characterized with the same rigor as the initial biochars. The sequestration properties were tested using several methodologies. The first one is based on an in vitro approach, qualifying the environmental availability. It simulates the capacity of an aqueous medium to desorb pollutants. The others used a target biota (worm, radish, zucchini, chicken) to determine the relative bioavailability of each contaminant according to the carbon matrix used. These approaches were first applied to OECD-type artificial soils with peat as endogenous organic matter. After a selection of the best performing carbonaceous matrices in terms of sequestration, part of the previously described tests were applied on natural soils collected in France (Saint-Cyprien) and in Martinique (Morne-Rouge, Trinité), respectively contaminated with PCB+PCDD/F and CLD. On the artificial soils, safety tests were conducted on the microbiota and earthworms. The project mainly shows an interaction between the type of test (environmental availability or relative bioavailability depending on the target organism), the carbon matrix used (10 were used at least once) and the contaminants. For the latter, the effect goes beyond the family to which they belong, particularly within the PCBs. It has been shown that the structure of the molecule, through a gradient of polarity or steric hindrance, could be at the origin of very different behaviors. The PCDD/F family is the one that responded best, at least in hens. For carbonaceous matrices, it is clear that microporosity (abundance of pores of the order of nm in size) is a necessary condition for good sequestration of contaminants. It is mainly this property that explains the difference in efficiency between biochars and activated carbons. Finally, a bibliographic study has shown that the choice of highly condensed carbonaceous matrices of the activated carbon type corresponds to a form of carbon that is recalcitrant to biodegradation in soils, which means both an extended capacity over time to sequester the contaminants of interest and also a long term carbon storage. If the economic aspects of this strategy have not been investigated, it should be stressed that this environmental service should be deducted from the overall cost. In terms of perspective, a development of adapted tests for the evaluation of the innocuity is necessary because the carbon matrix is suspected to interact with the good progress of the classic enzymatic tests and thus to bias the results. Similarly, the incorporation rate of the carbonaceous matrix was not tested in the project because of the multiplication of the modalities, but now that certain matrices have been identified for their sequestering power, it would be appropriate to try to optimize it, or even to reduce it in order to limit the deleterious effects on soil life

Topics
  • pyrolysis
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • Carbon