Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Am, Lennon

  • Google
  • 3
  • 11
  • 98

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2004Influence of different bleaching systems on fracture toughness and hardness of enamel.citations
  • 2003Effect of mineral supplements to citric acid on enamel erosion.98citations
  • 2001Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Attin, T.
1 / 5 shared
Patyk, A.
1 / 1 shared
Lennon, Áine M.
3 / 3 shared
Müller, T.
1 / 24 shared
Meyer, K.
1 / 6 shared
Hellwig, E.
1 / 1 shared
Buchalla, W.
1 / 4 shared
Attin, Thomas
1 / 27 shared
Heydecke, G.
1 / 1 shared
Jr, Strub
1 / 1 shared
Butz, F.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2004
2003
2001

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Attin, T.
  • Patyk, A.
  • Lennon, Áine M.
  • Müller, T.
  • Meyer, K.
  • Hellwig, E.
  • Buchalla, W.
  • Attin, Thomas
  • Heydecke, G.
  • Jr, Strub
  • Butz, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of different bleaching systems on fracture toughness and hardness of enamel.

  • Attin, T.
  • Patyk, A.
  • Lennon, Áine M.
  • Am, Lennon
  • Müller, T.
Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of different bleaching procedures on the fracture toughness and microhardness of enamel. The labial aspects of 72 bovine incisors were prepared for microhardness determination. At baseline, Knoop hardness (KH) determination was conducted on each specimen. Moreover, the fracture toughness (FT) of enamel was assessed using Vickers hardness indentations with a load of 9.8 N. The length of both indentations and enamel cracks were recorded and used for calculation of FT. The samples were divided among six (A-F) groups (n = 12) and sectioned, resulting in a control and an experimental half. The samples were stored in artificial saliva for 10 days. The experimental halves were removed from the saliva and subjected to bleaching according to manufacturers' instructions (A: Opalescence Xtra, B: Opalescence Quick, C: Rapid White, D: Whitestrips, E: Opalescence 10%, F: Opalescence PF 15%). Bleaching with C-F was conducted daily (C: twice per day for 10 minutes, D: twice per day for 30 minutes, E: 8 hours, F: 4 hours), systems A-B were applied on the first and fifth day (A: twice for 10 minutes, B: 1 hour). Finally, Knoop hardness and FT were assessed and statistically compared to baseline values using Wilcoxon-tests (p < 0.05). KH and FT of the controls remained stable during storage in saliva. All bleaching regimens resulted in a statistically significant percentage loss of KH (mean + standard error of means): A: 17.3 +/- 2.8%, B: 8.6 +/- 3.3%; C: 83.5 +/- 0.61%, D: 29.0 +/- 1.9%, E: 9.0 +/- 2.91%, F: 5.4 +/- 2.2%. The percentage changes (mean + standard error of means) of FT in the experimental specimens were as follows: A: 3.9 +/- 9.5%, B: 0.1 +/- 4.7%; D: -8.2 +/- 7.1%, E: -18.9 +/- 4.7%, F: -12.0 +/- 4.7%. Due to severe surface softening, FT could not be determined for the samples in Group C. Applying Opalescence 10% resulted in a significant reduction in FT compared to baseline. In the remaining groups, changes in FT were not statistically significant.

Topics
  • surface
  • crack
  • hardness
  • fracture toughness