Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Meng, Try

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Prestressed concrete containment building: Creep, ageing and leakage. Application to VERCORS mockupcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Richard, Benjamin
1 / 6 shared
Heitz, Thomas
1 / 2 shared
Jason, Ludovic
1 / 7 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Richard, Benjamin
  • Heitz, Thomas
  • Jason, Ludovic
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Prestressed concrete containment building: Creep, ageing and leakage. Application to VERCORS mockup

  • Richard, Benjamin
  • Heitz, Thomas
  • Jason, Ludovic
  • Meng, Try
Abstract

The containment building (CB) is known as the third and last of the safety barriers. Its main function is to protect the environment from diffusion of radioactive products either in case of normal operating situation or in case of severe accident circumstance. Therefore, leak-tightness is an important factor to assess the serviceability life of the CB. In this context. Électricité de France (EDF) launched VERCORS project in 2014 [1] to improve the knowledge of leak-tightness in the CB under air pressure loading and ageing effects. It consists in a 1/3 scaled containment mock-up representing a 1300 MWe CB of a typical French PWR, and is designed in prestressed concrete. It is composed of a double wall structure with an active depressurization system in the inner wall space. Along with this project, international benchmarks have been proposed in order to compare different numerical simulations techniques, eventually to identify the best modeling practices related to the mechanical behavior of the containment. For the double wall system, the leak-tightness of the internal wall is directly related to cracks length and cracks opening, while the cracks are especially controlled by the prestress of the tendons. Thus, the estimation of prestress loss is a key step in the simulation. To this end, the computation of the delayed strains in concrete and the relaxation of tendons are necessary.This paper presents the results of the simulation on VERCORS mockup in the prestress phases and pressurization phases, which iserformed on a finite element code Cast3m [2]. Concrete is modeled through 3D elements while rebar and tendons are modeled by 1D elements. The delayed strains including creep and shrinkage are calculated through BPEL99 model [3]. The loss of prestress caused by friction and relaxation are taken into account. Besides that, pressure load and ageing scenario are included. To describe cracks in concrete, an elastic damage model [4] is used for the concrete elements, and the post processing of leak-tightness is based on the internal variable of the damage model and hydraulic analysis. The mechanical results give different damage zones on the CB, which are distributed at gusset, hatch and dome. During the high-pressure load (over the dimensioning pressure), the damage at the dome dominates. The issues of the impact of potential simplification in the mockup description and/or of modeling choices are finally discussed.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • simulation
  • crack
  • aging
  • creep