People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lotfian, Saeid
University of Strathclyde
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (22/22 displayed)
- 2023Low electric field induction in BaTiO3-epoxy nanocompositescitations
- 2023Low electric field induction in BaTiO3-epoxy nanocompositescitations
- 2023Effect of initial grain size on microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ hybrid aluminium nanocomposites fabricated by friction stir processingcitations
- 2023Low electric field induction in BaTiO 3 -epoxy nanocomposites
- 2023Bioactive and biodegradable polycaprolactone-based nanocomposite for bone repair applicationscitations
- 2022Development of an injectable shear-thinning nanocomposite hydrogel for cardiac tissue engineeringcitations
- 2022Assessment of mechanical and fatigue crack growth properties of wire + arc additively manufactured mild steel componentscitations
- 2022Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic system
- 2022Mechanical Activation-Assisted Solid-State Aluminothermic Reduction of CuO Powders for In-Situ Copper Matrix Composite Fabricationcitations
- 2022Assessment of mechanical and fatigue crack growth properties of wire+arc additively manufactured mild steel componentscitations
- 2021Remanufacturing the AA5052 GTAW welds using friction stir processingcitations
- 2020Effect of multi-pass friction stir processing on textural evolution and grain boundary structure of Al-Fe3O4 systemcitations
- 2019Ultra-thin electrospun nanofibers for development of damage-tolerant composite laminatescitations
- 2019Development of damage tolerant composite laminates using ultra-thin interlaminar electrospun thermoplastic nanofibres
- 2019Towards the use of electrospun piezoelectric nanofibre layers for enabling in-situ measurement in high performance composite laminates
- 2018Electrospun piezoelectric polymer nanofiber layers for enabling in situ measurement in high-performance composite laminatescitations
- 2018Electrospun piezoelectric polymer nanofiber layers for enabling in situ measurement in high-performance composite laminatescitations
- 2018Development of damage tolerant composite laminates using ultra-thin interlaminar electrospun thermoplastic nanofibres
- 2018Towards the use of electrospun piezoelectric nanofibre layers for enabling in-situ measurement in high performance composite laminates
- 2015High temperature nanoindentation response of RTM6 epoxy resin at different strain ratescitations
- 2014Effect of layer thickness on the high temperature mechanical properties of Al/SiC nanolaminatescitations
- 2012High-temperature nanoindentation behavior of Al/SiC multilayerscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic system
Abstract
Background, Motivation and Objective <br/>In this paper, a new ultrasonic system is developed to measure the mechanical stresses. The study is part of a larger research project to use the Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) system for the residual stress measurement of high-value manufacturing and safety-critical components, like aerospace, wind turbines and nuclear structures. The stress measurement using the ultrasonic method is explained by the acoustoelastic effect which is based on the sound velocity change in an elastic material subjected to the static stress field. <br/><br/>Statement of Contribution/Methods <br/>Single element transducers are conventionally used for stress measurement using the ultrasonic method while the PAUT system is innovatively used in this paper. The mechanical stresses, tensile and compressive, are applied using a customized tensile test machine and vice clamp system. The ultrasonic arrays are 5 MHz transducers manufactured by IMASONIC (France) and configured in Longitudinal Critically Refracted (LCR) setup (see Fig. 1). The transmitter array generates 8 ultrasonic waves which are received by 8 elements of the receiver array. Therefore, a matrix of 8 × 8 acoustic paths can be generated. This has resulted in higher stress measurement accuracy, compared to the traditional setup in which only one acoustic path can be generated using two single element transducers, through minimization of the Time of Flight (ToF) measurement error, created by transmitter triggering uncertainty, wave speed changes in the transducers/wedge, positioning uncertainty, transducer alignment and material texture effects. Additionally, a higher measurement resolution was achieved because of the lower distance between the elements, array pitch was 0.5 mm compared to the >10 mm transducers distance in the single element setup.<br/><br/>Results/Discussion <br/>The PAUT-LCR system was able to detect variations in ToFs of the sample subjected to the stress changes. Therefore, the mechanical stress was successfully measured using this newly developed PAUT-LCR system. Using the acoustoelasticity law, the novel setup was also used to measure the acoustoelastic coefficient required for future residual stress measurement.<br/>