Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Javadi, Yashar

  • Google
  • 31
  • 83
  • 779

University of Strathclyde

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (31/31 displayed)

  • 2022Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic systemcitations
  • 2022Collaborative robotic wire + arc additive manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation16citations
  • 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluation16citations
  • 2021Feed forward control of welding process parameters through on-line ultrasonic thickness measurement17citations
  • 2021Non-contact in-process ultrasonic screening of thin fusion welded joints10citations
  • 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass welding29citations
  • 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probecitations
  • 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches19citations
  • 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches19citations
  • 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defects74citations
  • 2018Evolution of microstructure and toughness in 2.25Cr-1Mo steel welds19citations
  • 2018Laser induced phased arrays for remote ultrasonic imaging of additive manufactured componentscitations
  • 2018Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture ‎‎(WAAM) samples using conventional and total focusing method (TFM) ‎imaging approachescitations
  • 2017Comparison between using longitudinal and shear waves in ultrasonic stress measurement to investigate the effect of post-weld heat-treatment on welding residual stresses22citations
  • 2017Residual stress measurement round robin on an electron beam welded joint between austenitic stainless steel 316L(N) and ferritic steel P9152citations
  • 2017Measurement of residual stresses induced by sequential weld buttering and cladding operations involving a 2.25Cr-1Mo substrate material18citations
  • 2016Topographic inspection as a method of weld joint diagnostic25citations
  • 2016Investigation of mechanical properties in welding of shape memory alloys6citations
  • 2016Evaluation of hoop residual stress variations in the thickness of dissimilar welded pipes by using the LCR ultrasonic waves14citations
  • 2015Comparison between using longitudinal and shear waves in ultrasonic stress measurement to investigate the effect of post-weld heat-treatment on welding residual stresses22citations
  • 2015Sub-surface stress measurement of cross welds in a dissimilar welded pressure vessel30citations
  • 2015Evaluation of welding residual stress in a nickel alloy pressure vessel using the ultrasonic stress measurement techniquecitations
  • 2014Ultrasonic stress evaluation through thickness of a stainless steel pressure vessel23citations
  • 2014Nondestructive evaluation of welding residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel plates24citations
  • 2013Ultrasonic inspection of a welded stainless steel pipe to evaluate residual stresses through thickness60citations
  • 2013Using finite element and ultrasonic method to evaluate welding longitudinal residual stress through the thickness in austenitic stainless steel plates118citations
  • 2013Ultrasonic evaluation of welding residual stresses in stainless steel pressure vessel18citations
  • 2013Comparison between contact and immersion ultrasonic method to evaluate welding residual stresses of dissimilar joints49citations
  • 2013Employing the LCR waves to measure longitudinal residual stresses in different depths of a stainless steel welded plate23citations
  • 2013Nondestructive evaluation of welding residual stresses in dissimilar welded pipes24citations
  • 2012Residual stress evaluation in dissimilar welded joints using finite element simulation and the L CR ultrasonic wave32citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hutchison, Alistair
1 / 1 shared
Mehnen, Jorn
1 / 4 shared
Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
4 / 11 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
5 / 22 shared
Lotfian, Saeid
1 / 22 shared
Zimermann, Rastislav
4 / 9 shared
Gachagan, Anthony
9 / 76 shared
Macleod, Charles N.
11 / 45 shared
Pierce, Stephen
8 / 51 shared
Dingv, Jialuo
1 / 1 shared
Halavage, Steven
2 / 6 shared
Loukas, Charalampos
2 / 13 shared
Mohseni, Ehsan
2 / 4 shared
Williams, Stewart
6 / 39 shared
Mckegney, Scott
2 / 6 shared
Lines, David
6 / 18 shared
Pierce, Stephen Gareth
2 / 3 shared
Misael Pimentel, Espirindio E. Silva
1 / 1 shared
Fitzpatrick, Stephen
2 / 14 shared
Vithanage, Randika K. W.
1 / 2 shared
Vasilev, Momchil
9 / 17 shared
Ding, Jialuo
6 / 39 shared
Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
1 / 5 shared
Dobie, Gordon
1 / 21 shared
Galbraith, Walter
1 / 2 shared
Foster, Euan
1 / 8 shared
Stratoudaki, Theodosia
2 / 7 shared
Mineo, Carmelo
5 / 15 shared
Qiu, Zhen
2 / 14 shared
Sweeney, Nina E.
1 / 3 shared
Vasilev, M.
1 / 5 shared
Kerr, W.
1 / 4 shared
Dziewierz, Jerzy
2 / 9 shared
Su, R.
1 / 5 shared
Pierce, Stephen G.
1 / 1 shared
Williams, Stewart W.
1 / 33 shared
Su, Riliang
3 / 3 shared
Leonard, Andrew J.
1 / 1 shared
Elrefaey, Ahmed
2 / 2 shared
Callaghan, Mark D.
1 / 3 shared
Francis, John A.
1 / 23 shared
Kerr, William
2 / 3 shared
Wilcox, Paul D.
1 / 6 shared
Pieris, Don
1 / 4 shared
Clark, Matt
1 / 8 shared
Ghalehbandi, Seyed Mahmoud
2 / 2 shared
Roy, M. J.
2 / 5 shared
Azari, Khaled
2 / 2 shared
Dey, H. C.
1 / 3 shared
Hosseinzadeh, F.
1 / 6 shared
Smith, Michael
1 / 29 shared
Naveed, N.
1 / 2 shared
Smith, D. J.
1 / 26 shared
Mahadevan, S.
1 / 2 shared
Truman, C. E.
1 / 15 shared
Ainsworth, Robert
1 / 9 shared
Francis, John
2 / 20 shared
Venkata, K. Abburi
1 / 3 shared
Bhaduri, A. K.
1 / 6 shared
Bouchard, P. J.
1 / 21 shared
Forsey, A. N.
1 / 3 shared
Gungor, S.
1 / 6 shared
Walsh, Joanna
1 / 2 shared
Roy, Matthew
1 / 29 shared
Samardžić, Ivan
1 / 10 shared
Nieslony, Piotr
1 / 1 shared
Staš, L.
1 / 1 shared
Krolczyk, Jolanta B.
1 / 1 shared
Gapiński, Bartosz
1 / 6 shared
Souček, K.
1 / 3 shared
Maruda, Radoslaw W.
1 / 1 shared
Krolczyk, Grzegorz M.
2 / 3 shared
Legutko, Stanislaw
1 / 5 shared
Sadati, Mirshahin Hessam
1 / 1 shared
Hloch, Sergej
2 / 9 shared
Ashoori, Masoud
1 / 1 shared
Mosteshary, Seyed Hatef
1 / 1 shared
Pirzaman, Hsb
2 / 2 shared
Raeisi, Mohammadreza Hadizadeh
4 / 4 shared
Najafabadi, Mehdi Ahmadi
8 / 10 shared
Akhlaghi, Mehdi
3 / 3 shared
Pirzaman, Hamed Salimi
1 / 1 shared
Afzali, Omid
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hutchison, Alistair
  • Mehnen, Jorn
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Lotfian, Saeid
  • Zimermann, Rastislav
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
  • Dingv, Jialuo
  • Halavage, Steven
  • Loukas, Charalampos
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Williams, Stewart
  • Mckegney, Scott
  • Lines, David
  • Pierce, Stephen Gareth
  • Misael Pimentel, Espirindio E. Silva
  • Fitzpatrick, Stephen
  • Vithanage, Randika K. W.
  • Vasilev, Momchil
  • Ding, Jialuo
  • Misael, Pimentel Espirindio E. Silva
  • Dobie, Gordon
  • Galbraith, Walter
  • Foster, Euan
  • Stratoudaki, Theodosia
  • Mineo, Carmelo
  • Qiu, Zhen
  • Sweeney, Nina E.
  • Vasilev, M.
  • Kerr, W.
  • Dziewierz, Jerzy
  • Su, R.
  • Pierce, Stephen G.
  • Williams, Stewart W.
  • Su, Riliang
  • Leonard, Andrew J.
  • Elrefaey, Ahmed
  • Callaghan, Mark D.
  • Francis, John A.
  • Kerr, William
  • Wilcox, Paul D.
  • Pieris, Don
  • Clark, Matt
  • Ghalehbandi, Seyed Mahmoud
  • Roy, M. J.
  • Azari, Khaled
  • Dey, H. C.
  • Hosseinzadeh, F.
  • Smith, Michael
  • Naveed, N.
  • Smith, D. J.
  • Mahadevan, S.
  • Truman, C. E.
  • Ainsworth, Robert
  • Francis, John
  • Venkata, K. Abburi
  • Bhaduri, A. K.
  • Bouchard, P. J.
  • Forsey, A. N.
  • Gungor, S.
  • Walsh, Joanna
  • Roy, Matthew
  • Samardžić, Ivan
  • Nieslony, Piotr
  • Staš, L.
  • Krolczyk, Jolanta B.
  • Gapiński, Bartosz
  • Souček, K.
  • Maruda, Radoslaw W.
  • Krolczyk, Grzegorz M.
  • Legutko, Stanislaw
  • Sadati, Mirshahin Hessam
  • Hloch, Sergej
  • Ashoori, Masoud
  • Mosteshary, Seyed Hatef
  • Pirzaman, Hsb
  • Raeisi, Mohammadreza Hadizadeh
  • Najafabadi, Mehdi Ahmadi
  • Akhlaghi, Mehdi
  • Pirzaman, Hamed Salimi
  • Afzali, Omid
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic system

  • Hutchison, Alistair
  • Mehnen, Jorn
  • Wathavana Vithanage, Randika Kosala
  • Mohseni, Ehsan
  • Lotfian, Saeid
  • Zimermann, Rastislav
  • Gachagan, Anthony
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Macleod, Charles N.
  • Pierce, Stephen
Abstract

Background, Motivation and Objective ‎<br/>In this paper, a new ultrasonic system is developed to measure the mechanical stresses. The ‎study is part of a larger research project to use the Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) ‎system for the residual stress measurement of high-value manufacturing and safety-critical ‎components, like aerospace, wind turbines and nuclear structures. The stress measurement ‎using the ultrasonic method is explained by the acoustoelastic effect which is based on the ‎sound velocity change in an elastic material subjected to the static stress field. ‎<br/><br/>Statement of Contribution/Methods ‎<br/>Single element transducers are conventionally used for stress measurement using the ultrasonic ‎method while the PAUT system is innovatively used in this paper. The mechanical stresses, ‎tensile and compressive, are applied using a customized tensile test machine and vice clamp ‎system. The ultrasonic arrays are 5 MHz transducers manufactured by IMASONIC (France) and ‎configured in Longitudinal Critically Refracted (LCR) setup (see Fig. 1). The transmitter array ‎generates 8 ultrasonic waves ‎which are ‎received by 8 elements of the receiver array. ‎Therefore, ‎a matrix of 8 × 8 ‎acoustic paths can be generated. This has resulted in higher stress ‎measurement ‎accuracy, compared to the traditional setup ‎in which only one acoustic path can ‎be generated using two single element transducers, through minimization of the Time of Flight ‎‎(ToF) measurement error, created by transmitter triggering uncertainty, wave speed changes in ‎the transducers/wedge, positioning uncertainty, transducer alignment and material texture ‎effects. Additionally, a higher measurement resolution was achieved because of the lower ‎distance between the elements, array pitch was 0.5 mm compared to the &gt;10 mm transducers ‎distance in the single element setup.‎<br/><br/>Results/Discussion ‎<br/>The PAUT-LCR system was able to detect variations in ToFs of the sample subjected to the stress ‎changes. Therefore, the mechanical stress was successfully measured using this newly ‎developed PAUT-LCR system. Using the acoustoelasticity law, the novel setup was also used to ‎measure the acoustoelastic coefficient required for future residual stress measurement.‎<br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • texture
  • ultrasonic