Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cupac, Jagoda

  • Google
  • 3
  • 2
  • 15

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2021Flexural behaviour of post-tensioned glass beams15citations
  • 2015Comparative Study of Post-tensioned Glass Beams with Bonded Tendonscitations
  • 2015Post-Tensioned Structural Glass Beams - Comparative Experimental Studycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Louter, Christian
3 / 27 shared
Nussbaumer, Alain
1 / 21 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Louter, Christian
  • Nussbaumer, Alain
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Comparative Study of Post-tensioned Glass Beams with Bonded Tendons

  • Louter, Christian
  • Cupac, Jagoda
Abstract

This paper explores the system of laminated annealed glass beams post-tensioned through stainless steel tendons bonded to the lower glass edge. The tendons are first pre-tensioned and then adhesively bonded to the glass. The compressive pre-stress applied by the tendon increases the fracture strength of the beam; in case of glass fracture, the steel tendon provides ductility enhancing the post-fracture behaviour of the beam. In order to explore the optimal adhesive properties for such application, three types of structural adhesives were selected and applied in a post-tensioned glass beam system. The selected adhesives cover a range of stiffness from semi-rigid to rigid. Simple laminated glass beams were post-tensioned with a 15 kN force applied through the tendons and subsequently tested in four-point bending. The results show a structural response strongly dependent on the properties of the adhesive. While the application of pre-tension through stiffer adhesives significantly increased the initial fracture strength of the beams, an immediate loss of pre-stress was observed with the most flexible adhesive. Nevertheless, all the beams showed, to a varying extent, ductile postfracture behaviour and reached ultimate failure loads above the initial fracture load.

Topics
  • stainless steel
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • ductility