Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Viña, Jamie

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2012Numerical analysis of delamination growth in composite materials using Two Step Extension and Cohesive Zone methodscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mollón, Victoria
1 / 2 shared
Argüelles, Antonio
1 / 1 shared
Elmarakbi, Ahmed
1 / 38 shared
Bonhomme, Jorge
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mollón, Victoria
  • Argüelles, Antonio
  • Elmarakbi, Ahmed
  • Bonhomme, Jorge
OrganizationsLocationPeople

conferencepaper

Numerical analysis of delamination growth in composite materials using Two Step Extension and Cohesive Zone methods

  • Viña, Jamie
  • Mollón, Victoria
  • Argüelles, Antonio
  • Elmarakbi, Ahmed
  • Bonhomme, Jorge
Abstract

The simulation of delamination using the Finite Element Method (FEM) is a useful tool to analyze fracture mechanics. In this paper, simulations are performed by means of two different fracture mechanics models: Two Step Extension (TSEM) and Cohesive Zone (CZM) methods, using implicit and explicit solvers, respectively. TSEM is an efficient method to determine the energy release rate components GIc, GIIc and GIIIc using the experimental critical load (Pc) as input, while CZM is the most widely used method to predict crack propagation (Pc) using the critical energy release rate as input. Both methods were compared in terms of convergence performance and accuracy to represent the material behaviour and in order to investigate their validity to predict mode-I interlaminar fracture failure in unidirectional AS4/8552 carbon fibre composite laminates. Numerical simulations are compared with experimental results performed by means of Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) in order to discuss the results and to have a full visualization of this damage. Results showed a good agreement among both FEM models and experimental results.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • simulation
  • crack
  • composite