Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mellor, Glen

  • Google
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2019Shelf life extension of vacuum packaged chilled beef in the Chinese supply chain. A feasibility studycitations
  • 2015Genomic characterization of atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) strains from Australian cattlecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Luo, Xin
1 / 1 shared
Li, Yutao
1 / 1 shared
Frank, Damian
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, Yimin
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Xue
1 / 1 shared
Stark, Janet
1 / 1 shared
Kaur, Mandeep
1 / 7 shared
Hughes, Joanne
1 / 1 shared
Barlow, Robert
1 / 1 shared
Delannoy, Sabine
1 / 1 shared
Duffy, Lesley
1 / 3 shared
Fegan, Narelle
1 / 3 shared
Fach, Patrick
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Luo, Xin
  • Li, Yutao
  • Frank, Damian
  • Zhang, Yimin
  • Chen, Xue
  • Stark, Janet
  • Kaur, Mandeep
  • Hughes, Joanne
  • Barlow, Robert
  • Delannoy, Sabine
  • Duffy, Lesley
  • Fegan, Narelle
  • Fach, Patrick
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Genomic characterization of atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) strains from Australian cattle

  • Mellor, Glen
  • Barlow, Robert
  • Delannoy, Sabine
  • Duffy, Lesley
  • Fegan, Narelle
  • Fach, Patrick
Abstract

Introduction: Testing of beef products for the presence of pathogenic Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (pSTEC) occurs in a number of international markets. Testing typically relies on the molecular detection of stx, eae, and a pSTEC O serotype in mixed bacterial enrichments. Refinement of pSTEC test systems is occurring via the incorporation of additional gene targets but remains complicated by the presence of non-pSTEC isolates such as aEPEC that may harbor various combinations of these target genes. The purpose of this work was to conduct comparative genome assessment of a collection of aEPEC isolates from Australian cattle to identify the impact these organisms may have on pSTEC detection and confirmation test systems. Methods: Twenty-five aEPEC isolates comprising O26, O103, O145 and non-pSTEC serotypes from Australian cattle were characterized for the presence of 50 genetic targets including non-LEE effector genes, CRISPR sequences, T3SS encoding genes and the E. coli attaching and effacing gene-positive conserved fragment 1 (ecf1) using the Biomark Fluidigm 48.48 Dynamic Array and conventional PCR. Results: Two distinct populations of aEPEC isolates were identified based on the presence of ecf1. Isolates harboring ecf1 were likely to contain additional pSTEC markers espK (73%), espV (93%), espN (67%), Z2098 (87%), Z2099 (87%) and ureD (80%). In contrast ecf1 negative isolates did not harbor any of these markers. With the exception of a single ecf1 negative O26 isolate, the presence of CRISPR sequences was exclusively associated with ecf1 positive isolates of pSTEC serotypes.Significance:Whilst the clinical importance of aEPEC strains that harbor a range of additional pSTEC markers is not well understood, their presence in Australian cattle populations is problematic for pSTEC test system performance. Identification of additional gene markers or SNPs to distinguish aEPEC strains from pSTEC would substantially enhance the power of pSTEC test systems.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy