| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kok, P. De
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (2/2 displayed)
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Influence of dentin and enamel on the fracture resistance of restorations at several thicknesses
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of substrate and thickness on the fracture resistance of bonded dental restorative materials. Methods: Cylindrical restorations (d = 4.0 mm) of resin composites Filtek Supreme XTE, Clearfil AP-X, Lava Ultimate and glass-ceramic IPS e.max CAD were fabricated at thicknesses of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 2.0 mm respectively (n = 10 per group) and adhesively bonded to bovine enamel or dentin. The load to failure (LtF in N) of all specimens was determined in a universal testing machine and two one-way ANOVAs with a post hoc LSD tests and separate independent samples t-tests, performed at a significance level of 5%. Results: At 0.5 and 1.0 mm, direct resin composites bonded to dentin showed a higher LtF than when bonded to enamel, while the indirect materials showed reversed results (P< 0.05). At 2.0 mm there was no difference except for LU. A direct relationship between LtF and increasing thicknesses on enamel was found, while on dentin the LtF of direct resin composite restorations was less dependent on the thickness.