People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kärki, Janne
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (29/29 displayed)
- 2016Corrosion Testing of Thermal Spray Coatings in a Biomass Co-Firing Power Plantcitations
- 2015Oxygen blast furnace with CO 2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill:Part II: Economic Feasibility in Comparison with Conventional Blast Furnace Highlighting Sensitivitiescitations
- 2015Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel millcitations
- 2015Corrigendum to "Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill
- 2015Thermal spray coatings for high-temperature corrosion protection in biomass co-fired boilerscitations
- 2015Corrigendum to "Oxygen blast furnace with CO 2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill:Part II: Economic feasibility in comparison with conventional blast furnace highlighting sensitivities" [Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 32 (2015) 189-196]
- 2015Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process:Part 3: Solid recovered fuel produced from municipal solid wastecitations
- 2015Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production processcitations
- 2014Costs and potential of carbon capture and storage at an integrated steel mill:Technology screening and development pathway
- 2014Costs and potential of carbon capture and storage at an integrated steel mill
- 2014Oxygen blast furnace with CO 2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill-Part I:Technical concept analysiscitations
- 2014Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill-Part Icitations
- 2014Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process.:Part 1: SRF produced from commercial and industrial wastecitations
- 2014Thermal spray coatings for high temperature corrosion protection in biomass co-fired boilers
- 2014Thermal spray coatings for high temperature corrosion protection of advanced power plants -performance and feasibility studies in a biomass-fired boiler
- 2014Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process.:Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition wastecitations
- 2014Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process.citations
- 2013Costs and potential of carbon capture and storage at an integrated steel millcitations
- 2013Coating solutions against high temperature corrosion - performance validation and feasibility at biomass fired boilers
- 2005Mitigation of Formation of Chlorine Rich Deposits Affecting on Superheater Corrosion under Co-Combustion Conditions (CORBI)
- 2004The advantages of co-firong peat and wood in improving boiler operation and performance
- 2004Fuel blend characteristics and performance of co-fired fluidised bed boilers
- 2004Puupolttoaineiden vaikutus voimalaitoksen käytettävyyteen - PUUT24
- 2003Variation, effect and control of forest chip quality in CHP
- 2003High performance and low emissions - optimisation of multifuel-based bioenergy production
- 2003The effect of wood fuels on power plant availability
- 2003The importance of fuel control in improving the availability of biomass-fired power plants
- 2002Puupolttoaineiden vaikutus voimalaitoksen käytettävyyteen
- 2002Optimisation of multifuel-based bioenergy production
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
The advantages of co-firong peat and wood in improving boiler operation and performance
Abstract
VTT Processes has studied co-firing of peat and wood based fuels inseveral national and international research projects. Utilisation of solidbiofuels sets new demands for fuel handling and feeding systems as well as forcombustion technologies. Wood fuels differ from peat in many properties;moisture content, heating value, energy density, particle size, ash contentand ash quality etc. All these factors effect greatly on fuel combustionbehaviour. One of the most important differences between wood fuels and peatis ash behaviour during combustion. Typically wood fuels contain higher amountof weak acid soluble alkaline metals, potassium and sodium, when compared topeat. These alkaline metals exist in different forms of compounds (sulphates,chlorides, nitrates, etc.) or they are attached directly to organic matter ingrowing plants. Easily soluble alkalies are released during combustion intogas phase and cause risk for boiler bed material agglomeration, fouling ofheat transfer surfaces and superheater corrosion. These phenomena have effecton power plant availability and production economics and thus they should becarefully recognised. Fouling inhibits heat transfer and reduces boilerefficiency, additionally; chlorine rich deposits induce hot corrosion of heattransfer surfaces. Effect of different fuels on deposition and corrosion havebeen studied by deposit and material testing probes, both in VTT's testfacilities and in power plant boilers. Studies show that with co-firing peatwith wood a great deal of benefits is achieved in controlling emissions andharmful forming of deposition. Depending on the boiler type, it is recommendedto combust 10 - 20 % of peat with wood fuels in order to reduce abovementioned operational problems. If wood fuels consist mainly of new treegrowth, like logging residue, it is favourable to use even higher share ofpeat, 30 - 40 %, as co-firing fuel.