Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Amin, Azriszul Mohd

  • Google
  • 12
  • 10
  • 32

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (12/12 displayed)

  • 2017Parameter Optimization Of Natural Hydroxyapatite/SS316l Via Metal Injection Molding (MIM)3citations
  • 2016Evaluation of porosity in metal injectioncitations
  • 2016Solvent Debinding of MIM Parts in a Polystyrene-Palm Oil Based Binder System3citations
  • 2016Characterization of Stainless Steel 316L Feedstock for Metal Injection Molding (MIM) Using Waste Polystyrene and Palm Kernel Oil Binder System6citations
  • 2015HOMOGENEITY CHARACTERISATION OF STAINLESS STEEL 316L FEEDSTOCK FOR WASTE POLYSTYRENE BINDER SYSTEMcitations
  • 2015Green Strength Optimization in Metal Injection Molding applicable with a Taguchi Method L9 (3) 44citations
  • 2015Processability study of Natural Hydroxyapatite and SS316L via metal injection molding3citations
  • 2015Mechanical properties of SS316L and natural hydroxyapatite composite in metal injection moldingcitations
  • 2015GREEN DENSITY OPTIMISATION WITH SUSTAINABLE SEWAGE FAT AS BINDER COMPONENTS IN SS316L FEEDSTOCK OF METAL INJECTION MOULDING PROCESS (MIM) BY TAGUCHI METHOD2citations
  • 2015Solvent debinding variables on leaching Fat, Oil and Grease (FOG) derivatives of green part stainless steel SS316L metal injection moulding3citations
  • 2014Mixing and Characterisation of Stainless Steel 316L Feedstock for Waste Polystyrene Binder System in Metal Injection Molding (MIM)6citations
  • 2014Mixing Study of Aluminium Waste as Metal Powder for Waste Polystyrene Binder System in Metal Injection Molding (MIM)2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mustafa, N.
9 / 10 shared
Asmawi, Rosli
11 / 16 shared
Ibrahim, Mohd Halim Irwan
11 / 14 shared
Kamdani, Kamaruddin
1 / 3 shared
Taufek, Thoufeili
1 / 2 shared
Masrol, Shaiful Rizal
1 / 7 shared
Mustapha, Najwa
1 / 1 shared
Hashim, Mohd Yussni
1 / 5 shared
Wahab, Md Saidin
1 / 1 shared
Alawi, N.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016
2015
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mustafa, N.
  • Asmawi, Rosli
  • Ibrahim, Mohd Halim Irwan
  • Kamdani, Kamaruddin
  • Taufek, Thoufeili
  • Masrol, Shaiful Rizal
  • Mustapha, Najwa
  • Hashim, Mohd Yussni
  • Wahab, Md Saidin
  • Alawi, N.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Evaluation of porosity in metal injection

  • Amin, Azriszul Mohd
  • Kamdani, Kamaruddin
  • Taufek, Thoufeili
Abstract

Metal Injection Moulding (MIM) is more like plastic injection moulding but with metals. Lubricated metalpowder are prepared with a thermoplastic binder, and moulded in an injection moulding machine into a mould that is verysimilar to a normal injection mould [1]. After moulding, the “green compacted” moulding material is sent through a debindingprocess and then through a sintering process. MIM is capable of producing in both large and small volumes,complex shapes and from almost all types of material including metals, ceramics, inter-metallic, compounds, andcomposites. With no official binder and also exact value for green optimal criteria in MIM, the process for MIM usingpowder far from been using massively in machining industries [2][3]. In this study, the 60% of Stainless Steel (SS316L)powder loading with binder ratio 50/50 of sewage fat or fats, oil and grease (FOG) and Polypropylene (PP) will be use andanalyse for optimal injection and binder parameter. The objective is to determine the porosity and crack at the surface ofthe brown part using Non-Destructive Test (NDT) process. The percentage of weight loss after solvent and thermaldebinding process also have been identified. Hexane has been used as the solvent to remove binder in solvent debindingprocess. Moreover, the best temperature for hexane to remove binder in sample has been identified which is 50 ˚C ofhexane has been picked as the best temperature compared to 40 ˚C of hexane. Thermal debinding has been used to removePolypropylene (PP) in sample. Both temperature for thermal debinding has been tested which is 40 ˚C and 50 ˚C. The besttemperature for thermal debinding is 400 ˚C because it will produce higher percentage of ferum but lower percentage ofoxygen. Forming less number of oxygen content will prebent oxidation on sample.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • compound
  • stainless steel
  • Oxygen
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • crack
  • forming
  • porosity
  • ceramic
  • thermoplastic
  • oxygen content
  • sintering