Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Varelab, Benjamín Santos

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Coating degradation and rust creep assessment - A comparison between a destructive method according to ISO 12944 and selected non-destructive methodscitations
  • 2022Non-destructive Evaluation of Coating Degradation and Rust Creepcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bi, Huichao
2 / 13 shared
Ruiz, Álvaro Rodríguez
2 / 4 shared
González, Sergio
2 / 15 shared
Erik Weinell, Claus
2 / 33 shared
Dam-Johansen, Kim
2 / 56 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bi, Huichao
  • Ruiz, Álvaro Rodríguez
  • González, Sergio
  • Erik Weinell, Claus
  • Dam-Johansen, Kim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Non-destructive Evaluation of Coating Degradation and Rust Creep

  • Bi, Huichao
  • Ruiz, Álvaro Rodríguez
  • González, Sergio
  • Varelab, Benjamín Santos
  • Erik Weinell, Claus
  • Dam-Johansen, Kim
Abstract

Organic coatings are widely applied for the protection of metal structures from corrosion. The current methods for coating performance assessment rely on either subjective evaluation and comparison between photo references or destructive evaluation of test panels. Rust creep is established as one important indicator, as detailed in the ISO12944 and may act as a passing criterion of prequalification for coatings. However, the rust creep assessment according to ISO12944 is by nature destructive, and consequently the samples cannot re-enter into further testing cycles. Non-destructive methods allow for the evaluation of coating performance in a more efficient and cost-effective way where the same coated panel can be tested over time and the early corrosion advancement can be detected and monitored progressively. This allows not only the resources (man-hour and number of test samples) applied for the coating performance evaluation to be minimised, but also for a better understanding of the rust creep propagation/coating degradation mechanism. In the present work, two non-destructive techniques – optical 3D Profilometry and Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM) are applied to assess the rust creep from an artificially scribe line introduced in a coated panel. Assessment results from these two techniques are then compared with the ones obtained by the most commonly used destructive rust creep testing method based on ISO 12944-9. The comparison results show that the optical 3D Profilometry and SAM can act as the non-destructive test methods providing more efficient rust creep evaluation.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • corrosion
  • creep
  • scanning auger microscopy
  • profilometry