People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Javadi, Yashar
University of Strathclyde
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (31/31 displayed)
- 2022Mechanical stress measurement using phased array ultrasonic system
- 2022Collaborative robotic wire + arc additive manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic non-destructive evaluationcitations
- 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluationcitations
- 2021Feed forward control of welding process parameters through on-line ultrasonic thickness measurementcitations
- 2021Non-contact in-process ultrasonic screening of thin fusion welded jointscitations
- 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass weldingcitations
- 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probe
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approachescitations
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approachescitations
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defectscitations
- 2018Evolution of microstructure and toughness in 2.25Cr-1Mo steel weldscitations
- 2018Laser induced phased arrays for remote ultrasonic imaging of additive manufactured components
- 2018Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture (WAAM) samples using conventional and total focusing method (TFM) imaging approaches
- 2017Comparison between using longitudinal and shear waves in ultrasonic stress measurement to investigate the effect of post-weld heat-treatment on welding residual stressescitations
- 2017Residual stress measurement round robin on an electron beam welded joint between austenitic stainless steel 316L(N) and ferritic steel P91citations
- 2017Measurement of residual stresses induced by sequential weld buttering and cladding operations involving a 2.25Cr-1Mo substrate materialcitations
- 2016Topographic inspection as a method of weld joint diagnosticcitations
- 2016Investigation of mechanical properties in welding of shape memory alloyscitations
- 2016Evaluation of hoop residual stress variations in the thickness of dissimilar welded pipes by using the LCR ultrasonic wavescitations
- 2015Comparison between using longitudinal and shear waves in ultrasonic stress measurement to investigate the effect of post-weld heat-treatment on welding residual stressescitations
- 2015Sub-surface stress measurement of cross welds in a dissimilar welded pressure vesselcitations
- 2015Evaluation of welding residual stress in a nickel alloy pressure vessel using the ultrasonic stress measurement technique
- 2014Ultrasonic stress evaluation through thickness of a stainless steel pressure vesselcitations
- 2014Nondestructive evaluation of welding residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel platescitations
- 2013Ultrasonic inspection of a welded stainless steel pipe to evaluate residual stresses through thicknesscitations
- 2013Using finite element and ultrasonic method to evaluate welding longitudinal residual stress through the thickness in austenitic stainless steel platescitations
- 2013Ultrasonic evaluation of welding residual stresses in stainless steel pressure vesselcitations
- 2013Comparison between contact and immersion ultrasonic method to evaluate welding residual stresses of dissimilar jointscitations
- 2013Employing the LCR waves to measure longitudinal residual stresses in different depths of a stainless steel welded platecitations
- 2013Nondestructive evaluation of welding residual stresses in dissimilar welded pipescitations
- 2012Residual stress evaluation in dissimilar welded joints using finite element simulation and the L CR ultrasonic wavecitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probe
Abstract
The market for cost-effective additive manufactured (AM) complex components has evolved rapidly within the recent years urging the practitioners to devise robust non-destructive evaluation strategies to ensure the quality and integrity of such components. Among other AM techniques, Wire + Arc Additive manufacturing (WAAM) has particularly proven to offer high deposition rates allowing to manufacture large-scale near net shape components within shorter lead-times. However, it is difficult to fully control the occurrence of manufacturing defects such as gas pores, lack of fusion, and keyholes, especially when the gas tungsten arc welding provides the process heat. Phased Array Ultrasonics Testing (PAUT) has been one of the preferred long-standing non-destructive evaluation methods used to inspect such weld defects and has a clear potential to be applied in WAAM inspection. Performing interlayer inspection of WAAM reduces the scrappage and re-work time.For an effective WAAM inspection, it is essential to establish a good contact between the PAUT array and the complex surface of the WAAM. Thereby, an PAUT roller probe with a flexible tire that can tolerate high temperatures (< 350˚C) was designed and developed. The tire accommodates the geometric mismatch between the curved surface of the WAAM and the stand-off delay line within the roller probe – shown in Figure 1(a). Also, it is equally important to correct the PAUT focal laws such that the UT beam is well-focused as the roller probe scans over a WAAM component with a varying surface profile. This enhances and maintains the detection sensitivity along the sample. For this purpose, a Surface Adaptive Ultrasound (SAUL) algorithm was embedded in a robotically delivered inspection system. The system is planned and executed in LabVIEW to interface a KUKA KRC4 robot controller, PEAK LTPA PAUT controller and a Micro-Epsilon laser profiler (see Figures 1(b) and (c)). Required contact and orientation between PAUT roller probe and the WAAM component is maintained through real time force-torque control. During the scan, the surface profile is acquired at a predefined frequency using the laser profiler, and then processed on the fly within the SAUL algorithm to update the PAUT controller focal laws helping to keep in a consistent depth of focus regardless of the changes of the WAAM surface. The system was initially tested on an aluminium reference bock which was specifically designed with a varying surface curvature and flat bottom holes of 1 mm in diameter. The performance is also assessed using a titanium WAAM wall with flat bottom holes. Holes were successfully detected in both studies.