Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Khuri-Yakub, Butrus

  • Google
  • 8
  • 39
  • 309

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2022Applications of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers: A Comprehensive Review69citations
  • 2010Miniaturized Ultrasound Imaging Probes Enabled by CMUT Arrays with Integrated Frontend Electronic Circuitscitations
  • 2009A Family of Intracardiac Ultrasound Imaging Devices Designed for Guidance of Electrophysiology Ablation Procedurescitations
  • 2005Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: Fabrication technologycitations
  • 2004Forward-viewing CMUT arrays for medical Imagingcitations
  • 2004Ultrasonic mixing in microfluidic channels using integrated transducers240citations
  • 2002Piezoelectrically actuated flextensional micromachined ultrasound droplet ejectorscitations
  • 2002Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: Next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging?citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Joseph, Jose
1 / 1 shared
Ma, Bo
1 / 1 shared
Shivkumar, Kalyanam
2 / 3 shared
Zhuang, Steve
1 / 1 shared
Gencel, Mustafa
1 / 2 shared
Mahajan, Aman
2 / 7 shared
Chen, Peter
2 / 6 shared
Uyen Truong, U.
1 / 1 shared
Nikoozadeh, Amin
2 / 7 shared
Oralkan, Oemer
2 / 7 shared
Choe, Jung Woo
1 / 4 shared
De La Rama, Alan
1 / 2 shared
Thomenius, Kai
1 / 2 shared
Dentinger, Aaron
1 / 2 shared
Lin, Feng
1 / 6 shared
Wygant, Ira O.
1 / 9 shared
Odonnell, Matthew
2 / 5 shared
Wildes, Douglas
2 / 2 shared
Seo, Chi Hyung
1 / 2 shared
Stephens, Douglas N.
2 / 4 shared
Sahn, David J.
2 / 4 shared
Nguyen, Hien
1 / 1 shared
Dentinger, Aaron M.
1 / 1 shared
Cannata, Jonathan M.
1 / 1 shared
Shung, K. Kirk
1 / 1 shared
Thomenius, Kai E.
1 / 1 shared
Oralkan, O.
3 / 4 shared
Ergun, A. S.
3 / 5 shared
Yaralioglu, G. G.
2 / 3 shared
Huang, Y. L.
1 / 1 shared
Zhuang, X. F.
1 / 1 shared
Karaman, M.
2 / 2 shared
Demirci, U.
2 / 2 shared
Marentis, T. C.
1 / 1 shared
Wygant, I. O.
1 / 1 shared
Percin, G.
1 / 1 shared
Johnson, J. A.
1 / 7 shared
Kaviani, K.
1 / 1 shared
Lee, T. H.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2010
2009
2005
2004
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Joseph, Jose
  • Ma, Bo
  • Shivkumar, Kalyanam
  • Zhuang, Steve
  • Gencel, Mustafa
  • Mahajan, Aman
  • Chen, Peter
  • Uyen Truong, U.
  • Nikoozadeh, Amin
  • Oralkan, Oemer
  • Choe, Jung Woo
  • De La Rama, Alan
  • Thomenius, Kai
  • Dentinger, Aaron
  • Lin, Feng
  • Wygant, Ira O.
  • Odonnell, Matthew
  • Wildes, Douglas
  • Seo, Chi Hyung
  • Stephens, Douglas N.
  • Sahn, David J.
  • Nguyen, Hien
  • Dentinger, Aaron M.
  • Cannata, Jonathan M.
  • Shung, K. Kirk
  • Thomenius, Kai E.
  • Oralkan, O.
  • Ergun, A. S.
  • Yaralioglu, G. G.
  • Huang, Y. L.
  • Zhuang, X. F.
  • Karaman, M.
  • Demirci, U.
  • Marentis, T. C.
  • Wygant, I. O.
  • Percin, G.
  • Johnson, J. A.
  • Kaviani, K.
  • Lee, T. H.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: Fabrication technology

  • Khuri-Yakub, Butrus
  • Oralkan, O.
  • Ergun, A. S.
  • Yaralioglu, G. G.
  • Huang, Y. L.
  • Zhuang, X. F.
Abstract

Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (cMUT) technology is a prime candidate for next generation imaging systems. Medical and underwater imaging and the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) societies have expressed growing interest in cMUTs over the years. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer technology is expected to make a strong impact on imaging technologies, especially volumetric imaging, and to appear in commercial products in the near future. This paper focuses on fabrication technologies for cMUTs and reviews and compares variations in the production processes. We have developed two main approaches to the fabrication of cMUTs: the sacrificial release process and the recently introduced wafer-bonding method. This paper gives a thorough review of the sacrificial release processes, and it describes the new wafer-bonding method in detail. Process variations are compared qualitatively and quantitatively whenever possible. Through these comparisons, it was concluded that wafer-bonded cMUT technology was superior in terms of process control, yield, and uniformity. Because the number of steps and consequent process time were reduced (from six-mask process to four-mask process), turn-around time was improved significantly.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • ultrasonic