Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cutler, Mark

  • Google
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0

University of Dundee

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2012Optimal feature selection for estimating biomass using a genetic algorithmcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vetrivel, Anand
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vetrivel, Anand
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Optimal feature selection for estimating biomass using a genetic algorithm

  • Cutler, Mark
  • Vetrivel, Anand
Abstract

Whilst the use of SAR and multispectral image texture has shown promise for estimating tropical forest biomass, there remains uncertainty over the optimum number and type of texture features that provide reliable models to estimate biomass across different forest sites.Previous studies have consistently suggested that selecting an appropriate window size for extracting texture is critical, as small window sizes often exaggerate texture whilst larger window sizes create smoothing effects.There are also a variety of image texture features that have previously been correlated with biomass (e.g. wavelet decomposition and GLCM outputs such as entropy, homogeneity, energy etc.).Neural network regression methods allow any number of these variables (and window sizes) to be included in the regression model.However, this increases the dimensionality of the input data with resultant effects on the ability of the network to learn and generalise.It is desirable to try and restrict the dimensionality of the inputs, particularly when using small samples for predictive modelling, a characteristic of many biomass estimation studies. <br/> <br/>Common methods for feature selection include Principal Components Analysis (PCA) but are not always suited to this kind of problem.Here, we compare PCA feature selection with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach, using separately an artificial neural network and Fuzzy c-means as fitness functions.A combination of texture features were derived from SAR and multispectral images of three tropical forest sites.Evaluation of the optimum combination of these features to estimate aboveground biomass was conducted by applying each of the three feature selection methods in turn, and then using the features selected as inputs to estimate biomass with a neural network.The correlation between the input training data and the unseen testing data was used as a measure of model performance for estimating biomass. <br/> <br/>The results indicated that features selected using the GA approach with a neural network used as a fitness function produced the strongest relationships with biomass at the three sites (r=0.91, 0.89 and 0.87 for Brazil (n=9), Malaysia (n=9) and Thailand (n=13) respectively), compared to the other GA approach and PCA.In all cases, the texture features and window sizes selected varied, although some commonality in selection between Malaysia and Brazil sites was noted.Overall, the GA approaches selected features that produced stronger relationships than PCA with evidence that these hold much promise for determining the optimum set of inputs for biomass estimation models, although much work is still required. <br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • texture
  • decomposition