| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Siena, Francesco Del
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (2/2 displayed)
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: outsourcing materials
Abstract
<p><b>Purpose</b>: To test different Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks, comparing mean flexural strength (σ), Weibull modulus (m), and Weibull characteristic strength (σ<sub>0</sub>) in an ISO standardized set-up. </p><p><b>Methods</b>: Following the recent ISO Standard (ISO 6872:2008), 11 types of ceramic blocks were tested: IPS e.max CAD MO, IPS e.max CAD LT and IPS e.max CAD HT (lithium disilicate glass-ceramic); In-Ceram SPINELL, In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia (glass-infiltrated materials); inCoris AL and In-Ceram AL (densely sintered alumina); In-Ceram YZ, IPS e.max Zir-CAD and inCoris ZI (densely sintered zirconia). Specimens were cut out from ceramic blocks, finished, crystallized/infiltrated/sintered, polished, and tested in a three-point bending test apparatus. Flexural strength, Weibull characteristic strength, and Weibull modulus were obtained. </p><p><b>Results</b>: A statistically significant difference was found (P< 0.001) among lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (σ = 272.6±376.8 MPa, m = 6.2±11.3, σ<sub>0</sub> = 294.0±394.1 MPa) and densely sintered alumina (σ = 441.8±541.6 MPa, <i>m</i> = 11.9±19.0, σ<sub>0</sub> = 454.2±565.2 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.254) in glass infiltrated materials (σ = 376.9±405.5 MPa, <i>m</i> = 7.5±11.5, σ<sub>0</sub> = 393.7±427.0 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.160) in densely sintered zirconia (σ = 1,060.8±1,227.8 MPa, <i>m</i> = 5.8±7.4, σ<sub>0</sub> = 1,002.4±1,171.0 MPa). Not all the materials tested fulfilled the requirements for the clinical indications recommended by the manufacturer.</p>