| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ferrari, Marco
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024Piezoelectric MEMS Flexural-Plate-Wave Transducer for Alignment of Microparticles in a Drying Dropletcitations
- 2023Flexural Plate Wave Piezoelectric MEMS Pressure Sensorcitations
- 2023Cell Alignment in Aqueous Solution Employing a Flexural Plate Wave Piezoelectric MEMS Transducercitations
- 2023Application of dissipative particle dynamics to interfacial systems: Parameterization and scalingcitations
- 2022Flexural Plate Wave Piezoelectric MEMS Transducer for Cell Alignment in Aqueous Solutioncitations
- 2022Visible and near-InfraRed (VNIR) reflectance of silicate glasses: Characterization of a featureless spectrum and implications for planetary geologycitations
- 2022Reflectance of silicate glasses in the mid-infrared region (MIR): Implications for planetary researchcitations
- 2021Mineralogical implications for the 1-micron feature in the refined average spectrum of Ceres
- 2021High-Pressure Synthesis and Gas-Sensing Tests of 1-D Polymer/Aluminophosphate Nanocompositescitations
- 2021High-Pressure Synthesis and Gas-Sensing Tests of 1-D Polymer/Aluminophosphate Nanocompositescitations
- 2019NIR and mid-IR spectroscopy on silicate glasses for the characterization of magmatic bodies on terrestrial planets.
- 2018Spectroscopy on silicate glasses from two magmatic series: implications for planetary studies.
- 2017Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramicscitations
- 2017FT-IR and μ-IR analysis of Carbonaceous Chondrite meteorites characterization as possible analogue of next sample returned materials
- 2016Wild 2 grains characterized combining MIR/FIR/Raman micro-spectroscopy and FE-SEM/EDS analyses
- 2014Wild 2 grains characterized combining MIR/FIR/Raman micro-spectroscopy and FE-SEM/EDS analyses
- 2014Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: outsourcing materials
- 2013Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks
- 2012In Situ Collection of Refractory Dust in the Upper Stratosphere: The DUSTER Facilitycitations
- 2006Acid etching surface treatment of feldspathic, alumina and zirconia ceramics: a micro-morphological SEM analysis.
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: outsourcing materials
Abstract
<p><b>Purpose</b>: To test different Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks, comparing mean flexural strength (σ), Weibull modulus (m), and Weibull characteristic strength (σ<sub>0</sub>) in an ISO standardized set-up. </p><p><b>Methods</b>: Following the recent ISO Standard (ISO 6872:2008), 11 types of ceramic blocks were tested: IPS e.max CAD MO, IPS e.max CAD LT and IPS e.max CAD HT (lithium disilicate glass-ceramic); In-Ceram SPINELL, In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia (glass-infiltrated materials); inCoris AL and In-Ceram AL (densely sintered alumina); In-Ceram YZ, IPS e.max Zir-CAD and inCoris ZI (densely sintered zirconia). Specimens were cut out from ceramic blocks, finished, crystallized/infiltrated/sintered, polished, and tested in a three-point bending test apparatus. Flexural strength, Weibull characteristic strength, and Weibull modulus were obtained. </p><p><b>Results</b>: A statistically significant difference was found (P< 0.001) among lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (σ = 272.6±376.8 MPa, m = 6.2±11.3, σ<sub>0</sub> = 294.0±394.1 MPa) and densely sintered alumina (σ = 441.8±541.6 MPa, <i>m</i> = 11.9±19.0, σ<sub>0</sub> = 454.2±565.2 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.254) in glass infiltrated materials (σ = 376.9±405.5 MPa, <i>m</i> = 7.5±11.5, σ<sub>0</sub> = 393.7±427.0 MPa). No statistically significant difference was found (P= 0.160) in densely sintered zirconia (σ = 1,060.8±1,227.8 MPa, <i>m</i> = 5.8±7.4, σ<sub>0</sub> = 1,002.4±1,171.0 MPa). Not all the materials tested fulfilled the requirements for the clinical indications recommended by the manufacturer.</p>