Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sestakova, Lucie

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2010Optimal strength and fracture toughness of damage tolerant multilayer ceramicscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lube, Tanja
1 / 8 shared
Danzer, R.
1 / 10 shared
Bermejo, Raúl
1 / 38 shared
Chart of publication period
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lube, Tanja
  • Danzer, R.
  • Bermejo, Raúl
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Optimal strength and fracture toughness of damage tolerant multilayer ceramics

  • Lube, Tanja
  • Danzer, R.
  • Sestakova, Lucie
  • Bermejo, Raúl
Abstract

<p>The size and type processing and/or machining defects in monolithic ceramic materials determine the mechanical strength of components, thus yielding a statistically variable brittle fracture which limits their use for load-bearing applications. Layered ceramics have been proposed as an alternative choice for the design of structural ceramics with improved fracture toughness and reliability. The use of tailored residual compressive stresses in the layers is the key parameter to improve the strength as well as the crack resistance of the material during crack growth, yielding in some particular cases a minimum mechanical resistance (threshold strength below which the material does not fail. In this work two multilayer ceramics based on the alumina-zirconia system, designed with external (ECS-laminatesand internal (ICS-laminatescompressive stresses, have been investigated using a fracture mechanics and weight function analysis. An optimal multilayer architecture that maximises material toughness and strength has been found for each design as a function of geometry and material properties. From a flaw tolerant viewpoint, ECS-laminates are suitable for ceramic components which contain small cracks or flaws. On the other hand, the existence of large cracks or defects suggests the use of ICS-laminates to attain a more reliable mechanical response. This analysis can be extended to other multilayer ceramic systems.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • layered
  • ceramic
  • fracture toughness
  • ion chromatography
  • electron coincidence spectroscopy