Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Martin, Mike

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020“I agree to being socially quantified”citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wilson, Rob
1 / 1 shared
Jamieson, David
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wilson, Rob
  • Jamieson, David
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

“I agree to being socially quantified”

  • Wilson, Rob
  • Martin, Mike
  • Jamieson, David
Abstract

Objectives: The more digitally entrenched we become as a society, the more, it seems, we are becoming embroiled within the machinations of digital platforms and their owners, and information systems and their designers. Despite recent conversations to the contrary, we are somewhat powerless to prevent such things as the monitoring of our location, the tracking of our behaviors, and what information might be shared and exchanged about us. When signing up and agreeing to use digital platforms and information systems, the pressing needs of individuals to secure a service or product take precedence over anything else. To this extent, it seems that we have all agree to be socially quantified without a real understanding - nor the control - of what this actually entails.Data and Methods: Using a case study approach, we apply a socio-technical lens to a range of digital platforms and information systems, consent and EULA’s. We suggest that it is unlikely that most End Users comprehend, understand or even acknowledge the content of what it is they are agreeing to. In light of this, we argue that there exists an increasingly difficult challenge to establish a mutual understanding of what consent actually is and how this is communicated to the End User.Results: This paper presents a model which positions the concept of consent and EULA’s within a socio-technical framing. This model approaches consent as two systems of information: the first is an attribute in a data model - a tick box, an ‘I Agree’ button; the other is a socio technical construct of moral orders which contains the feelings, convictions and aspirations of the End User as they engage in the use of digital systems, and the intentions of the digital platform owners and information system designers.Conclusions: Our model introduces two distinct paradigms as a frame to discuss and appropriate the notion of consent: information distribution processing systems, and information communication systems. The application of this framing provides a transparent understanding between the End User and the intentions of the digital platform owners and information systems designers they use, and they data that is exchanged as a result.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy