People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Eckert, Richard B.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (8/8 displayed)
- 2022Optimizing Corrosion Mitigation Costs Using Failure Analysis
- 2021Review of Current Gaps in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Failure Investigations in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Sector
- 2021Using Failure Analysis to Optimize Corrosion Mitigation Costs
- 2021Time to Agree: The Efforts to Standardize Molecular Microbiological Methods (MMM) For Detection of Microorganisms in Natural and Engineered Systems
- 2021Failure Investigation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Upstream Pipeline Operations – Trends and Gaps
- 2021Laboratory investigation of biocide treated waters to inhibit biofilm growth and reduce the potential for MIC
- 2021Microbiological Tests Used to Diagnose Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) in Failure Investigations
- 2019Pipeline Failure Investigation: Is it MIC?
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Laboratory investigation of biocide treated waters to inhibit biofilm growth and reduce the potential for MIC
Abstract
Introducing water into pipelines for various applications, such as hydrotesting, long term layup, hydraulic fracturing, water injection, and other production related activities poses the threat of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) when conditions are favorable. The focus of this paper is to outline a test method to evaluate the potential for MIC with untreated waters and subsequently assess the effectiveness of biocides to inhibit biofilm growth and mitigate MIC. The changes in the microbial activity, abundance, and diversity in the biofilm along with pitting and general corrosion rates on the carbon steel are used as evaluation techniques in this laboratory test method. The results of this work demonstrate the importance of using biofilms for biocide evaluations and could be used to support new industry standards for evaluating the effectiveness of biocides for MIC control, rather than basing performance on planktonic kill studies.