Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Duncan, Kathleen

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Time to Agree: The Efforts to Standardize Molecular Microbiological Methods (MMM) For Detection of Microorganisms in Natural and Engineered Systemscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Paula, Renato M. De
1 / 1 shared
Tsesmetzis, Nicolas
1 / 1 shared
Eckert, Richard B.
1 / 8 shared
Gieg, Lisa
1 / 1 shared
Skovhus, Torben Lund
1 / 47 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Paula, Renato M. De
  • Tsesmetzis, Nicolas
  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Gieg, Lisa
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Time to Agree: The Efforts to Standardize Molecular Microbiological Methods (MMM) For Detection of Microorganisms in Natural and Engineered Systems

  • Paula, Renato M. De
  • Tsesmetzis, Nicolas
  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Gieg, Lisa
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
  • Duncan, Kathleen
Abstract

In the past decade, molecular microbiological methods (MMM) have significantly expanded the understanding of the microbial populations in several environments, including oilfields and associated infrastructure. These methods are now highly regarded as accurate, comprehensive, and useful to aid the optimization of microbial control strategies. The resulting information has helped operators and service companies to better assess the threat of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) and act upon it. Nonetheless, despite finding acceptance in the industry, the results from these methods can greatly vary from lab to lab, due to the lack of a standardized protocol. In this study, we describe the joint effort of an initiative between operators, service companies, 3rd party labs and universities to establish a consensus on how to properly collect and preserve samples for molecular analysis, and agree on a set of lab protocols to allow comparable results. We show how all the stakeholders used science-based conclusions to decide on the most comprehensive protocols that balances easiness of use in the field and accuracy of results. This industry-wide effort to standardize these methods will have a profound impact on data collection, quality of data and assessment of microbiological threats in the field.

Topics
  • corrosion