Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Abillo, Andre

  • Google
  • 4
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2021Review of Current Gaps in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Failure Investigations in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Sectorcitations
  • 2021Failure Investigation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Upstream Pipeline Operations – Trends and Gapscitations
  • 2021Microbiological Tests Used to Diagnose Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) in Failure Investigationscitations
  • 2020Integration of State-of-the-Art Methods for Assessing Possible Failures due to Microbiologically Influenced Corrosioncitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Eckert, Richard B.
3 / 8 shared
Wolodko, John
4 / 5 shared
Skovhus, Torben Lund
4 / 47 shared
Eckert, Rickard
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Wolodko, John
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
  • Eckert, Rickard
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Review of Current Gaps in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Failure Investigations in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Sector

  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Abillo, Andre
  • Wolodko, John
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
Abstract

Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) is an interdisciplinary threat to the oil and gas industry. Currently 10-40% of all corrosion issues in the sector are related to MIC. However, due to the unpredictability that microorganisms add to MIC management and diagnosis, MIC is yet not fully understood. The present study was performed to assess the current methods used to diagnose MIC in oil and gas production pipelines. A comprehensive review of 50 failure assessments ran between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019 in the Province of Alberta, Canada, was carried out. Lines of evidence related to microbiology, chemistry, metallurgy and 25operating factors were reviewed and the frequency in which they were considered was quantified. Biotic independent factors (chemical, metallurgical, and operating) were assessed in more than 90% of the assessments while only 70% took microbiological analyses into consideration. Molecular microbiological methods (MMM) were ran for only 6 to 10% of the assessments. Additionally, this study offers a traceable number that can be linked to MIC: 11.7% of corrosion failures in oil and gas production pipelines in Alberta between the 3-year period reviewed was caused by MIC either as the main failure mechanism or as a contributing factor. Therefore, this presentation aims to discuss best tactics for MIC failure investigations and how to integrate the interdisciplinary lines of evidence required to conclusively diagnose MIC. Also emphasizing the need for optimized tools, such as MMM, to bridge the current gap where only 70% of microbiological driven failures were evaluated by microbiological tools.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • corrosion