Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Abillo, Andre

  • Google
  • 4
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2021Review of Current Gaps in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Failure Investigations in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Sectorcitations
  • 2021Failure Investigation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in Alberta’s Oil and Gas Upstream Pipeline Operations – Trends and Gapscitations
  • 2021Microbiological Tests Used to Diagnose Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) in Failure Investigationscitations
  • 2020Integration of State-of-the-Art Methods for Assessing Possible Failures due to Microbiologically Influenced Corrosioncitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Eckert, Richard B.
3 / 8 shared
Wolodko, John
4 / 5 shared
Skovhus, Torben Lund
4 / 47 shared
Eckert, Rickard
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Wolodko, John
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
  • Eckert, Rickard
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Microbiological Tests Used to Diagnose Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) in Failure Investigations

  • Eckert, Richard B.
  • Abillo, Andre
  • Wolodko, John
  • Skovhus, Torben Lund
Abstract

Failures in oil and gas operations as a result of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) can be challenging to assess. This is primarily due to the similar conditions and corrosion products that both MIC and other abiotic corrosion mechanisms (e.g., H2S, CO2 corrosion) require and produce. Reason why the use of correct methodologies to assess microbiologically related evidence is paramount to a conclusive diagnosis. This presentation discusses the process of adoption of molecular microbiological methods (MMM) to assess MIC, as standards move away from culturing-based methods. Microbiological data gathered in 50 MIC related failure assessments conducted in oil and gas pipelines in Alberta, Canada, will be presented. The goal is to compare the incidence of use of MMM and selective media for culturing to perform MIC related failure investigations. Additionally, it is analyzed how these methods influence in the quality of data obtained, by contrasting the different groups of microorganisms they are able to identify (e.g., sulfate reducing bacteria, acid producing bacteria) and how these microorganisms can be linked to other layers of evidence.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • corrosion