Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bilotsky, Yevgen

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Enhancement of gingival tissue adherence of zirconia implant posts : In vitro study6citations
  • 2018High-output screening and biomechanical optimization of biomaterials for orthopaedic applicationscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gasik, Michael
2 / 46 shared
Shahramian, Khalil
1 / 3 shared
Närhi, Timo
1 / 2 shared
Kangasniemi, Ilkka
1 / 2 shared
Zühlke, Alexandra
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gasik, Michael
  • Shahramian, Khalil
  • Närhi, Timo
  • Kangasniemi, Ilkka
  • Zühlke, Alexandra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

High-output screening and biomechanical optimization of biomaterials for orthopaedic applications

  • Bilotsky, Yevgen
  • Gasik, Michael
Abstract

Evaluation of different biomaterials is being performed with various methods trying to simulate the closest hostile-like in vitro environments. However the complexity of the conditions usually limits practically feasible combination of most relevant chemical, biological, biomechanical parameters in one single test. Many biomaterials and tissue engineering developments rely on high-throughput screening to multiply number of specimens and thus to gather sufficient data. The price to be paid for these methods is limited number of physical readouts, increased inter-specimens scatter, and unavoidable spatial constrains driving the conditions away of the clinical scenarios. For orthopaedic biomaterials this is of a particular concern, as implantation site conditions cannot be squeezed too much without lost of natural-mimicking stimuli.<br/><br/>Here we are presenting another approach based on high-output screening of biomaterials, which is based on the strategy of raising the number of readouts obtainable from every specimen at more clinically-relevant conditions. On the contrary to common methods like ISO 10993 or simplified biomechanical tests, the biomaterials enhanced simulation testing (BEST) evaluates specimens without pre-selected biomaterial model, assessing the whole specimen as would happen in the implantation site. Besides reducing the risk of improper conclusions caused by wrong material model choice, the data processing with non-local method intrinsically includes the test history bypassing common challenges usually seen with hereditary integration. For properly designed experiment, readouts might include invariant moduli, viscous stiffness, fluidity, fluid permittivity and diffusivity (without need for pressure-driven separate tests), fluid source, effective channel size, and swelling pressure (if swelling is present) in addition to conventional biomechanical parameters.<br/><br/>New solutions in advanced and consistent evaluations for biomaterials allow better risks control, shorten lead development time and costs, and compliant with 3R-strategy (2010/63/EC) and new regulatory requirements (2012/0266/COD in EU and FY2017 regulatory priorities by FDA). The approach shown is able to combine scientifically based tests with multi-purpose protocols to secure patient safety by screening of biomaterials under proper conditions.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • diffusivity
  • biomaterials