Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brown, C.

  • Google
  • 7
  • 43
  • 213

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2022Frequency-controlled dielectrophoresis-driven wetting of nematic liquid crystals4citations
  • 2021Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-Throughput Drive-Through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts. 136citations
  • 2016Mn(dca)2(o-phen) {dca = dicyanamide; O-phen = 1,10-phenanthroline}: Long-range magnetic order in a low-dimensional Mn-dca polymer8citations
  • 2016Indentation stiffness does not discriminate between normal and degraded articular cartilage.25citations
  • 2015Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: How costly is an OSCE?citations
  • 2014Electronic correlations in FeGa3 and the effect of hole doping on its magnetic properties37citations
  • 2011Simultaneous detection of HFE C282Y, H63D and S65C mutations associated with type 1 haemochromatosis using a multiplex luminex bead assay.3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Saxena, A.
1 / 8 shared
Edwards, A.
1 / 1 shared
Bhadwal, A.
1 / 1 shared
Sage, I.
1 / 1 shared
Mottram, N.
1 / 1 shared
Perez, G.
1 / 11 shared
Moran, A.
1 / 2 shared
Pollock, Nira
1 / 1 shared
Volinsky, L.
1 / 1 shared
Sc, Smole
1 / 1 shared
Lc, Madoff
1 / 1 shared
Nj, Lennon
1 / 1 shared
Smith, S.
1 / 9 shared
Patel, P.
1 / 10 shared
Carroll, M.
1 / 2 shared
Scarry, A.
1 / 1 shared
Gabriel, S.
1 / 3 shared
Cy, Okane
1 / 1 shared
Tj, Roady
1 / 1 shared
Ae, Cranston
1 / 1 shared
Jr, Jacobs
1 / 1 shared
Tran, K.
1 / 1 shared
Singleton, J.
1 / 16 shared
Schlueter, J.
1 / 8 shared
Blundell, S.
1 / 33 shared
Huang, Q.
1 / 22 shared
Manson, J.
1 / 5 shared
Pratt, F.
1 / 14 shared
Lancaster, T.
1 / 23 shared
Lynn, J.
1 / 1 shared
Crawford, R.
1 / 1 shared
Oloyede, A.
1 / 1 shared
Walsh, Kieran
1 / 1 shared
Ross, Sarah
1 / 1 shared
Cleland, Jen
1 / 1 shared
Puri, A.
1 / 4 shared
Tomczak, J. M.
1 / 4 shared
Gamza, M. B.
1 / 1 shared
Kotliar, G.
1 / 1 shared
Aronson, M. C.
1 / 1 shared
Patel, R.
1 / 7 shared
Sp, Cardoso
1 / 1 shared
Navarrete, C.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2016
2015
2014
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Saxena, A.
  • Edwards, A.
  • Bhadwal, A.
  • Sage, I.
  • Mottram, N.
  • Perez, G.
  • Moran, A.
  • Pollock, Nira
  • Volinsky, L.
  • Sc, Smole
  • Lc, Madoff
  • Nj, Lennon
  • Smith, S.
  • Patel, P.
  • Carroll, M.
  • Scarry, A.
  • Gabriel, S.
  • Cy, Okane
  • Tj, Roady
  • Ae, Cranston
  • Jr, Jacobs
  • Tran, K.
  • Singleton, J.
  • Schlueter, J.
  • Blundell, S.
  • Huang, Q.
  • Manson, J.
  • Pratt, F.
  • Lancaster, T.
  • Lynn, J.
  • Crawford, R.
  • Oloyede, A.
  • Walsh, Kieran
  • Ross, Sarah
  • Cleland, Jen
  • Puri, A.
  • Tomczak, J. M.
  • Gamza, M. B.
  • Kotliar, G.
  • Aronson, M. C.
  • Patel, R.
  • Sp, Cardoso
  • Navarrete, C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: How costly is an OSCE?

  • Brown, C.
  • Walsh, Kieran
  • Ross, Sarah
  • Cleland, Jen
Abstract

Introduction: The OSCE is an important component of assessment and yet is undoubtedly expensive (Patricio, et al. 2013). This study aims to evaluate the costs for one OSCE examination at one medical school however the message of the unrecognised cost of clinical exams is important for all. Methods: In 2013 the Aberdeen University held a two-day OSCE for 185 final year students. The costs of different stages of development and administration of this high-stakes OSCE were determined. Results: This OSCE cost our institution £65,328. Question development & testing costs approximated £6,280, £419 per question. Production costs were mostly examiner and patient training time, £8,154. The majority of costs occurred administering the examination including consumables, catering and staff time £52,504. The largest expense was examiner time £26,938. Post-examination costs included administrative tasks, exam board meeting and checking failed papers, £3,191. The most expensive station was depression history taking utilising actors, costing £5,105, an additional £2981 to the standard question cost. The cheapest station was prescribing, a total station cost of £2,760, an addition of only £636 to the standard cost. The total cost per student was approximately £293. Discussion: Cost in medical education assessment is a complex area; there are differences across institutions that lead to huge variations in cost, the use of volunteer patients in our institution incurs no cost, however other institutions pay up to £230 per patient. The main cost associated with the conduct of the OSCE is examiner time. Conclusion: The OSCE is expensive to run. With students and regulators demanding formative as well as summative OSCES costs are significant. Further work will need to identify whether the OSCE is value for money and tie to measures of utility- is it generalizable, valid, acceptable and economically feasible? (Walsh, et al. 2013).

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy