| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mela, Kristo
Tampere University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (17/17 displayed)
- 2024Test methods for determination of shear properties of sandwich panels
- 2024Experimental and Numerical Study of Steel-faced Profiled Sandwich Panels with PIR Core Loaded in Flexure
- 2023Experimental investigation on the tensile behaviour of welded RHS high strength steel X-jointscitations
- 2023Experimental investigation on the tensile behaviour of welded RHS high strength steel X-jointscitations
- 2023Equivalent material properties of the heat-affected zone in welded cold-formed rectangular hollow section connectionscitations
- 2023Equivalent material properties of the heat-affected zone in welded cold-formed rectangular hollow section connectionscitations
- 2022Fracture simulation of welded RHS X-joints using GTN damage modelcitations
- 2022Fracture simulation of welded RHS X-joints using GTN damage modelcitations
- 2022Translational stiffness and resistance of sandwich panel connections at elevated temperaturecitations
- 2022Shear resistance of sandwich panel connection at elevated temperaturecitations
- 2022Probabilistic modelling of residual stresses in cold-formed rectangular hollow sectionscitations
- 2022Effective material model for cold-formed rectangular hollow sections in beam element-based advanced analysiscitations
- 2021Load-bearing capacity of cold-formed sinusoidal steel sheetscitations
- 2019Experimental study on temperature distribution of sandwich panel joints in fire
- 2019Numerical analysis of the behaviour of stainless steel cellular beam in fire
- 2019Temperature distribution of trapezoidal sheeting in fire
- 2017Economical design of high strength steel trusses using multi-criteria optimizationcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Experimental study on temperature distribution of sandwich panel joints in fire
Abstract
Previous research have demonstrated that significant cost savings can be achieved, if cladding panels forming the building envelope are used to provide stability. There is research information and design guidance available for normal temperature design. However, the information available for fire conditions is very limited and it is not known if the panels are able to stabilize steel frame members also at elevated temperatures. The stiffness and resistance of joints, cladding panels and connectors are required for the assessment of interaction between cladding and frame in fire. Temperatures of those components are in important role when evaluating the stabilization effect. This paper presents an experimental research conducted to determine the temperature fields in sandwich panels, supporting structural steel members and screw connectors. Eight full-scale fire tests were carried out where the structural steel sections supporting sandwich panels were exposed to ISO 834 fire attack on three sides. The test specimen consisted of a fire protected steel beam and load-bearing sandwich panels with both mineral wool and polyisocyanurate (PIR) core. Two different steel beam sections were used in the tests: HEA 160 (S355) and RHS 150x150x8 (S420). This paper introduces the experimental research and the main observations related to the temperatures. The results show that at failure of the specimens the measured screw temperatures were very different in HEA and RHS tests. The temperatures in HEA tests were much higher than in RHS tests the maximum difference in screw<br/>point temperatures being over 400°C. In all the specimens, screw head temperatures were very low throughout the tests, well below 100°C. The tests were part of ongoing RFCS project STABFI.