People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kuutti, Juha
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (17/17 displayed)
- 2024Constraint effects on fracture toughness of ductile cast iron in the ductile regimecitations
- 2022Effect of Welding Direction and Bead Pattern in Alloy 52 / SA508 Repair Weld
- 2022Sensitivity of the Master Curve reference temperature T0 to the crack front curvaturecitations
- 2022Miniature C(T) Specimens-Pinhole Eccentricity and the Effect of Crack Opening Displacement Measurement Locationcitations
- 2021Evaluation of an Alloy 52 / Cladded Carbon Steel Repair Weld by Cold Metal Transfer
- 2021Online nonlinear ultrasound imaging of crack closure during thermal fatigue loadingcitations
- 2020Numerical assessment of the effects of microcrack interaction in AM componentscitations
- 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Evaluation of different techniques
- 2020A52M/SA502 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld
- 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld:Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizationscitations
- 2020A52M/SA52 Dissimilar Metal RPV Repair Weld : Experimental Evaluation and Post-Weld Characterizationscitations
- 2018Comparison of ASME XI and BS7910 Allowable Surface Flaw Size Evaluation Procedures in Piping Componentscitations
- 2017Use of CTOD as crack driving force parameter for low-cycle thermal fatigue
- 2013Disposal canister shock absorber tests and analysis
- 2012A local remeshing procedure to simulate crack propagation in quasi-brittle materialscitations
- 2011Fracture Assessment of Reactor Circuit (FRAS):Advanced numerical fracture assessment methods
- 2010Simulation of ice crushing experiment using FE-model update technique
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Use of CTOD as crack driving force parameter for low-cycle thermal fatigue
Abstract
Repeated exposure to rapid temperature transients causesgradual damage in material. This iscalled thermal fatigue. Thermal fatigue is an importantdegradation mechanism in nuclear power plantcomponents and can limit the plant lifetime where thermalloads are present, e.g., due to turbulent mixingor change in plant operating conditions. The effects ofthe thermal load cycles include residual stresses,hardening or softening of the material and, finally,crack initiation and growth.Traditionally, thermal fatigue crack growth rates areestimated from the stress intensity factorscalculated from uncracked stress distributions and theParis' law. In the low-cycle regime, the use ofweight function based stress intensity factor solutionsderived under linear elastic assumptions isquestionable due to considerable plasticity. On the otherhand, numerical contour integral techniques areill-suited for thermal cyclic loading.In this work, the use of the crack opening displacementas the crack driving force parameter isevaluated through simulations of a low-cycle thermalfatigue experiments. The use of the crack tipopening displacement avoids the traditional limitationsin the numerical evaluation of the J-integral. Theunique relationship between the crack openingdisplacement and J-integral is derived and the crackdriving force is used in a crack growth assessment. Theresults show that the crack driving forcecalculated from the uncracked stress distributionsoverestimates the crack driving force significantly (ascompared to values calculated from the crack openingdisplacement). The crack growth rate calculatedwith the Paris' law is in good agreement with theexperimental results, when the crack driving force iscomputed from the crack opening displacement.