Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chandan, Amrit

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2015Investigating electrodes for intermediate temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell (IT-PEFC)citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rees, Neil
1 / 10 shared
Richmond, John
1 / 1 shared
Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
1 / 38 shared
Self, Valerie
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rees, Neil
  • Richmond, John
  • Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
  • Self, Valerie
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Investigating electrodes for intermediate temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell (IT-PEFC)

  • Chandan, Amrit
  • Rees, Neil
  • Richmond, John
  • Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert
  • Self, Valerie
Abstract

One of the ways Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells (PEFCs) can be improved is by increasing their operating temperature (>100 oC) [1], commonly known as the Intermediate Temperature PEFC (IT-PEFC) (120 oC) [2]. This allows for the generation of high temperature heat, which allows more facile heat rejection, while simplifying water management as water will exist solely in the vapour phase. In order to optimise these IT-PEFCs, further improvement in the cell components are necessary. A combination of simulation and experimental methods has been used to investigate the material properties of the Gas Diffusion Layer so that ideal parameters can be suggested for intermediate temperature operation. Specifically, the porosity, permeability, electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity were investigated. The influence of the GDL thickness, the Microporous layer and hydrophobic treatment were also studied. Results have shown that the GDL porosity is a key factor of influence on the PEFC electrode. The balance between the mass transport capabilities and the electrical conductivity is very important to the success of the electrode. It was found that the cell performance was most sensitive to the GDL porosity when the cell was in the “standard operating” range of 0.7-0.5 V and that a porosity between 40-60 % was best. The presence of a microporous layer and the hydrophobic treatment improve the MEA performance at intermediate temperature. The thinner GDL showed better performance, which was increased further when operating at higher temperature. The key aspect at high temperature is the balance between water management within the membrane and mass transport in the electrode.In conclusion, the GDL is an integral component of the PEFC, however, the effect of its properties on the MEA performance is not sufficiently understood. In the work presented, it is shown that the MEA performance is sensitive to changes in the GDL porosity and therefore electrical conductivity. The processing of the GDL is still key to MEA performance at intermediate temperature.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • phase
  • simulation
  • permeability
  • porosity
  • thermal conductivity
  • electrical conductivity