Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Szwajka, Krzysztof

  • Google
  • 14
  • 9
  • 64

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (14/14 displayed)

  • 2025Experimental Study on Mechanical Performance of Single-Side Bonded Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Plywood for Wood-Based Structurescitations
  • 2024Analysis of the Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of Resistance Spot-Welding of Ti6Al4V to DP600 Steel Using Copper/Gold Cold-Sprayed Interlayers2citations
  • 2024Effect of Countersample Coatings on the Friction Behaviour of DC01 Steel Sheets in Bending-under-Tension Friction Tests2citations
  • 2024Application of categorical boosting to modelling the friction behaviour of DC05 steel sheets in strip drawing test3citations
  • 2024Analysis of the friction performance of deep-drawing steel sheets using network models2citations
  • 2024The Effect of the Addition of Silicon Dioxide Particles on the Tribological Performance of Vegetable Oils in HCT600X+Z/145Cr46 Steel Contacts in the Deep-Drawing Processcitations
  • 2024Analysis of Influence of Coating Type on Friction Behaviour and Surface Topography of DC04/1.0338 Steel Sheet in Bending Under Tension Friction Testcitations
  • 2024Analysis of Coefficient of Friction of Deep-Drawing-Quality Steel Sheets Using Multi-Layer Neural Networks4citations
  • 2023Pressure-Assisted Lubrication of DC01 Steel Sheets to Reduce Friction in Sheet-Metal-Forming Processes7citations
  • 2023Assessment of the Tribological Performance of Bio-Based Lubricants Using Analysis of Variance15citations
  • 2023An Investigation into the Friction of Cold-Rolled Low-Carbon DC06 Steel Sheets in Sheet Metal Forming Using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks4citations
  • 2022The Use of Non-Edible Green Oils to Lubricate DC04 Steel Sheets in Sheet Metal Forming Process9citations
  • 2022Analysis of the Friction Mechanisms of DC04 Steel Sheets in the Flat Strip Drawing Test2citations
  • 2022Frictional Characteristics of Deep-Drawing Quality Steel Sheets in the Flat Die Strip Drawing Test14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Trzepieciński, Tomasz
11 / 26 shared
Szewczyk, Marek
14 / 14 shared
Zielińska-Szwajka, Joanna
5 / 5 shared
Barlak, Marek
2 / 7 shared
Ibrahim, Omar Maghawry
1 / 1 shared
Kaščák, Ľuboš
1 / 2 shared
Slota, Ján
1 / 4 shared
Okrasa, Sebastian
1 / 7 shared
Nowakowska-Langier, Katarzyna
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2025
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Trzepieciński, Tomasz
  • Szewczyk, Marek
  • Zielińska-Szwajka, Joanna
  • Barlak, Marek
  • Ibrahim, Omar Maghawry
  • Kaščák, Ľuboš
  • Slota, Ján
  • Okrasa, Sebastian
  • Nowakowska-Langier, Katarzyna
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Application of categorical boosting to modelling the friction behaviour of DC05 steel sheets in strip drawing test

  • Szwajka, Krzysztof
  • Szewczyk, Marek
Abstract

<jats:p>It is challenging to model the coefficient of friction, surface roughness, and related tribological processes during metal contact because of flattening, ploughing, and adhesion. It is important to choose the appropriate process parameters carefully when creating analytical models to overcome the challenges posed by complexity. This will ensure the production of sheet metal formed components that meets the required quality standards and is free from faults. This research analyses the impacts of nominal pressure, kinematic viscosity of lubricant, and lubricant pressure on the coefficient of friction and average roughness of DC05 deep-drawing steel sheets. The strip drawing test was used to determine the coefficient of friction. This work utilises the Categoric Boosting (CatBoost) machine learning algorithm created by Yandex to estimate the COF and surface roughness, intending to conduct a comprehensive investigation of process parameters. A Shapley decision plot exhibits the coefficient of friction prediction models via cumulative SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) data. CatBoost has outstanding prediction accuracy, as seen by R2 values ranging from 0.955 to 0.894 for both the training and testing datasets for the COF, as well as 0.992 to 0.885 for surface roughness.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • steel
  • drawing
  • machine learning
  • coefficient of friction
  • kinematic viscosity