Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lima, Daniel Bezerra

  • Google
  • 1
  • 9
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resincitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Braz, Rodivan
1 / 1 shared
Filgueira, Pedro Tardelly Diniz
1 / 1 shared
Sousa, Yasmine Carvalho De
1 / 1 shared
Sabino, Marcos Antonio
1 / 1 shared
Borges, Silvia Maria Pinto
1 / 1 shared
Albuquerque, Monica Soares De
1 / 1 shared
Lima, Eliane Alves De
1 / 1 shared
Fook, Marcus Vinicius Lia
1 / 2 shared
Nascimento, Armiliana Soares
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Braz, Rodivan
  • Filgueira, Pedro Tardelly Diniz
  • Sousa, Yasmine Carvalho De
  • Sabino, Marcos Antonio
  • Borges, Silvia Maria Pinto
  • Albuquerque, Monica Soares De
  • Lima, Eliane Alves De
  • Fook, Marcus Vinicius Lia
  • Nascimento, Armiliana Soares
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin

  • Braz, Rodivan
  • Filgueira, Pedro Tardelly Diniz
  • Sousa, Yasmine Carvalho De
  • Sabino, Marcos Antonio
  • Borges, Silvia Maria Pinto
  • Albuquerque, Monica Soares De
  • Lima, Eliane Alves De
  • Lima, Daniel Bezerra
  • Fook, Marcus Vinicius Lia
  • Nascimento, Armiliana Soares
Abstract

he aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect, degree of conversion (% DC), Vickers hardness (VH), and surface morphology of composite resins. Eleven resins, nine bulk-fill resins, and two conventional resins were evaluated. Each material was sampled to evaluate DC (using FTIR), VH, cytotoxicity (using MTT and Neutral Red - NR test), surface morphology (using SEM and AFM), and organic filler (using EDS). All statistical tests were performed with SPSS and the level of significance was set at 0.05. MTT revealed that the materials presented low or no cytotoxic potential in relation to the control. Opus was the resin with the lowest cell viability at a 1:2 concentration at 72 h (32%) and at 7 days (43%), but that significantly increased when the NR test was applied at a 1:2 concentration after 7 days. Thickness and surface subjected to polymerization had no influence on DC, and differences were observed only between the materials. In the microhardness test, statistical differences were observed between the evaluated thicknesses. The bulk-fill resins analyzed in this study exhibited low and/or no cytotoxicity to L929 cells, except for Opus, which showed moderate cytotoxicity according to the MTT assay. When the NR test was used, results were not satisfactory for all composites, indicating the need for different methodologies to evaluate the properties of these materials. The assessed resins demonstrated acceptable physicomechanical properties.

Topics
  • morphology
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • atomic force microscopy
  • composite
  • hardness
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • resin