Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Olívio, Émillyn T.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Optimization and Influence of GMAW Parameters for Weld Geometrical and Mechanical Properties Using the Taguchi Method and Variance Analysiscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Casarini, Arthur
1 / 2 shared
Coelho, João Paulo
1 / 2 shared
César, Manuel
1 / 1 shared
Ribeiro, João
1 / 7 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Casarini, Arthur
  • Coelho, João Paulo
  • César, Manuel
  • Ribeiro, João
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Optimization and Influence of GMAW Parameters for Weld Geometrical and Mechanical Properties Using the Taguchi Method and Variance Analysis

  • Casarini, Arthur
  • Coelho, João Paulo
  • César, Manuel
  • Olívio, Émillyn T.
  • Ribeiro, João
Abstract

Gas metal arc welding is one of the arc fusion processes that is widely used in industry due to its high efficiency. The correct selection of the input parameters has direct influence on the weld quality and, with the control of those parameters, it is possible to reduce the amount of weld material, improve its properties and then increase the productivity of the process. This study intends to take a group of weld parameters and submit them to the optimization by the Taguchi Method and check the influence of those through a Variance Analysis (ANOVA). An L9 orthogonal array gathered three parameters (weld voltage, weld speed and weld torch angle) into three levels, then, with all combinations set and performed, the macrography and the transversal tensile strength test provided, respectively, the geometrical and the mechanical properties. The signal-to-noise ratios enable the optimization and the ANOVA provided the influence of the input parameters on the response parameters. The weld speed appeared as the most influent parameter for the weld geometry, contributing 63.54% to reinforcement, 66.36% to width and 66.94% to penetration, and the weld torch angle the most influent to the ultimate transversal tensile strength (41.39%). The optimum levels to the reinforcement are 22.4 [V], 400 [mm/min] and 30 [°], to the width 22.4 [V], 300 [mm/min], 0 [°], to the penetration 23.3 [V], 400 [mm/min], 0 [°] and, lastly, to the ultimate transversal tensile strength 24.1 [V], 200 [mm/min], 15 [°]. The Taguchi method showed to be suitable for this kind of problem and giving an efficient experiment design and good results. Keywords: Taguchi method, Optimization, GMAW

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • strength
  • tensile strength