Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ebid, Ahmed

  • Google
  • 9
  • 16
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2024Predictive modeling of wide-shallow RC beams shear strength considering stirrups effect using (FEM-ML) approach2citations
  • 2023Prediction of the cementing potential of activated pond ash reinforced with glass powder for soft soil strengthening, by an artificial neural network modelcitations
  • 2023Characterization of net-zero pozzolanic potential of thermally-derived metakaolin samples for sustainable carbon neutrality constructioncitations
  • 2022Evaluation of the Compressive Strength of CFRP-Wrapped Circular Concrete Columns Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques17citations
  • 2022Decision Support System for Optimum Repair Technique of Concrete Bridges Girders in Egypt2citations
  • 2022Global warming potential-based life cycle assessment and optimization of the compressive strength of fly ash-silica fume concrete; environmental impact considerationcitations
  • 2021Prediction of shear strength of FRP reinforced beams with and without stirrups using (GP) techniquecitations
  • 2019Effect of Wrapping Reinforced Concrete Surface with FRP Sheets on Corrosion Resistance2citations
  • 2017STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF HANDY LAY-UP GFRP I-BEAMScitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Soliman, Ahmed A.
1 / 1 shared
Khalil, Ayman H.
1 / 1 shared
Kontoni, Denise-Penelope
2 / 2 shared
Oyewole, Samuel A.
1 / 1 shared
Stephen, Leslie
1 / 1 shared
Kontoni, D.-P. N.
1 / 2 shared
Adah, E. I.
1 / 2 shared
Onyia, M. E.
1 / 2 shared
Jagan, J.
1 / 2 shared
Samui, Pijush
1 / 1 shared
Soleymani, Atefeh
2 / 2 shared
Singh, Rahul Pratap
1 / 2 shared
Arafat, Hisham
1 / 1 shared
Mahdi, Ibrahim
1 / 1 shared
Mahdi, Hisham A.
1 / 1 shared
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Soliman, Ahmed A.
  • Khalil, Ayman H.
  • Kontoni, Denise-Penelope
  • Oyewole, Samuel A.
  • Stephen, Leslie
  • Kontoni, D.-P. N.
  • Adah, E. I.
  • Onyia, M. E.
  • Jagan, J.
  • Samui, Pijush
  • Soleymani, Atefeh
  • Singh, Rahul Pratap
  • Arafat, Hisham
  • Mahdi, Ibrahim
  • Mahdi, Hisham A.
  • Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Characterization of net-zero pozzolanic potential of thermally-derived metakaolin samples for sustainable carbon neutrality construction

  • Stephen, Leslie
  • Kontoni, D.-P. N.
  • Adah, E. I.
  • Onyia, M. E.
  • Ebid, Ahmed
Abstract

Metakaolin (MK) is one of the most sustainable cementitious construction materials, which is derived through a direct heating procedure known as calcination. Calcination process takes place substantially lower temperatures than that required for Portland cement, making it a more environmentally sustainable alternative to traditional cement. This procedure causes the removal of hydroxyl water from the naturally occurring kaolin clay (Al2Si2O5(OH)4 with MK (Al2O3·2SiO2) as its product. Kaolin naturally exists in large amount within 5°29'N-5°35'N and 7°21'E-7°3'E geographical coordinates surrounding Umuoke, Obowo, Nigeria. Alumina and silica are the predominant compounds in MK, which provide it with the pozzolanic ability, known as the 3-chemical pozzolanic potential (3CPP), with high potential as a cementitious material in concrete production and soil stabilization. Over the years, researchers have suggested the best temperature at which MK is derived to have the highest pozzolanic ability. Prominent among these temperature suggestions were 800 °C (3CPP of 94.45%) and 750 °C (3CPP of 94.76%) for 2 h and 5 h' calcination periods, respectively. In this research paper, 11 different specimens of Kaolin clay obtained from Umuoke, Nigeria, were subjected to a calcination process at oven temperatures from 350 to 850 °C in an increment of 50 °C for 1 h each to derive 11 samples of MK. The MK samples and Kaolin were further subjected to X-ray fluorescence), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) tests to determine the microstructural behaviour and the pozzolanic properties via the 3CPP as to exploit the best MK with the highest cementing potential as a construction material. The results show that the MK heated at 550 °C and 800 °C produced the highest pozzolanic potentials of 96.26% and 96.28%, respectively. The enhancement in pozzolanic potential at optimum calcination temperature is attributed to an increase in the specific surface area upon calcination of kaolinite confirmed by BET results. The SEM and XRD results further supported the above result with the strengthened crystal structure of the MK at these preferred temperatures. Generally, 550 °C is more preferred due to the less heat energy needed for its formulation during 1 h of calcination, which outperforms the previous results, that suggested 750 °C and 800 °C in addition to longer hours of heat exposure.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • compound
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • x-ray diffraction
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • cement