Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gouvêa, Ricardo Francisco

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Analysis of Co-Bonded and Secondary Bonded Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites Jointscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Oliveira, Arthur Scaglioni De
1 / 1 shared
Donadon, Maurício Vicente
1 / 6 shared
Brito, Camila Belo Gomes
1 / 1 shared
Arbelo, Mariano Andrés
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Oliveira, Arthur Scaglioni De
  • Donadon, Maurício Vicente
  • Brito, Camila Belo Gomes
  • Arbelo, Mariano Andrés
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Analysis of Co-Bonded and Secondary Bonded Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites Joints

  • Gouvêa, Ricardo Francisco
  • Oliveira, Arthur Scaglioni De
  • Donadon, Maurício Vicente
  • Brito, Camila Belo Gomes
  • Arbelo, Mariano Andrés
Abstract

Aiming to reduce aircraft weight, aeronautic industry seeks alternative materials and processes used to join its different structural parts. An option to traditional methods are high performance adhesive joints, which reduce weight, number of parts and component final cost, also resulting in higher strength structures. Although, the lack of experimental data to provide a detailed structural characterization of these joining techniques had limited their commercial application. The proposal of this work is to investigate the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness under quasi-static loading using DCB specimens of carbon composite joints made by co-bonding and secondary bonding techniques, the latter giving more reliable results. For a better understanding on the failure in the systems, DSC and microscopy techniques were applied, from which three stages of delamination process during testing were observed: 1st Stage) Cohesive failure represented by an unstable crack propagation from a high energy level; 2nd Stage) transition from cohesive to adhesive and final intralaminar failure mode with lower energy levels than Stage 1; and 3rd Stage) completely stable propagation at low energy levels (delamination migrates from intralaminar to interlaminar, entirely in the substrate).

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • crack
  • strength
  • composite
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • fracture toughness
  • joining
  • microscopy