Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ebid, Ahmed

  • Google
  • 9
  • 16
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2024Predictive modeling of wide-shallow RC beams shear strength considering stirrups effect using (FEM-ML) approach2citations
  • 2023Prediction of the cementing potential of activated pond ash reinforced with glass powder for soft soil strengthening, by an artificial neural network modelcitations
  • 2023Characterization of net-zero pozzolanic potential of thermally-derived metakaolin samples for sustainable carbon neutrality constructioncitations
  • 2022Evaluation of the Compressive Strength of CFRP-Wrapped Circular Concrete Columns Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques17citations
  • 2022Decision Support System for Optimum Repair Technique of Concrete Bridges Girders in Egypt2citations
  • 2022Global warming potential-based life cycle assessment and optimization of the compressive strength of fly ash-silica fume concrete; environmental impact considerationcitations
  • 2021Prediction of shear strength of FRP reinforced beams with and without stirrups using (GP) techniquecitations
  • 2019Effect of Wrapping Reinforced Concrete Surface with FRP Sheets on Corrosion Resistance2citations
  • 2017STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF HANDY LAY-UP GFRP I-BEAMScitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Soliman, Ahmed A.
1 / 1 shared
Khalil, Ayman H.
1 / 1 shared
Kontoni, Denise-Penelope
2 / 2 shared
Oyewole, Samuel A.
1 / 1 shared
Stephen, Leslie
1 / 1 shared
Kontoni, D.-P. N.
1 / 2 shared
Adah, E. I.
1 / 2 shared
Onyia, M. E.
1 / 2 shared
Jagan, J.
1 / 2 shared
Samui, Pijush
1 / 1 shared
Soleymani, Atefeh
2 / 2 shared
Singh, Rahul Pratap
1 / 2 shared
Arafat, Hisham
1 / 1 shared
Mahdi, Ibrahim
1 / 1 shared
Mahdi, Hisham A.
1 / 1 shared
Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Soliman, Ahmed A.
  • Khalil, Ayman H.
  • Kontoni, Denise-Penelope
  • Oyewole, Samuel A.
  • Stephen, Leslie
  • Kontoni, D.-P. N.
  • Adah, E. I.
  • Onyia, M. E.
  • Jagan, J.
  • Samui, Pijush
  • Soleymani, Atefeh
  • Singh, Rahul Pratap
  • Arafat, Hisham
  • Mahdi, Ibrahim
  • Mahdi, Hisham A.
  • Deifalla, Ahmed Farouk
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Prediction of the cementing potential of activated pond ash reinforced with glass powder for soft soil strengthening, by an artificial neural network model

  • Kontoni, Denise-Penelope
  • Ebid, Ahmed
  • Oyewole, Samuel A.
Abstract

The effect of Pond Ash (PA) activated with sodium chloride (NaCl) solution and reinforced with glass powder on the mechanical properties of soft clay soil, which comprise of the California bearing ratio (CBR) and the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) has been studied in this research work. The PA requires pozzolanic improvements to meet the ASTM C618 requirements for pozzolanas. In the present research paper, further emphasis has been on the machine learning prediction of CBR and UCS of the soft clay soil stabilized with a composite of PA. Generally, the studied soft clay soil properties, which were the microstructure, microspecter/micrograph, oxide composition, Atterberg limits, compaction behavior, free swell index (FSI), CBR and UCS significantly improved due to the enhanced cementitious ability of the activated and reinforced PA. The multiple data collected from this general stabilization result were used to predict the soil's CBR and UCS by the artificial neural network (ANN) technique. The results showed high performance of the model in terms of the sum of squares error (SSE) of 1.5% and 2.0% and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.9979 and 0.9973 for the CBR and UCS models, respectively. The models also outclassed the performances of other models from the literature.

Topics
  • microstructure
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • Sodium
  • composite
  • machine learning