Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Girardin, François

  • Google
  • 13
  • 21
  • 699

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2018Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approach20citations
  • 2018Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approach20citations
  • 2017Investigation of the performance of the MQL, dry, and wet turning by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN)77citations
  • 2017Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of Polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function110citations
  • 2017Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of Polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function110citations
  • 2017Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods63citations
  • 2017Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods63citations
  • 2017Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: A response surface methodology approachcitations
  • 2017Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: A response surface methodology approach12citations
  • 2016Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning process112citations
  • 2016Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning process112citations
  • 2015Modeling and optimization of tool wear and surface roughness in turning of austenitic stainless steel using response surface methodologycitations
  • 2015Modeling and optimization of tool wear and surface roughness in turning of austenitic stainless steel using response surface methodologycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Berkani, Sofiane
2 / 7 shared
Yallese, Mohamed Athmane
8 / 14 shared
Bouzid, Lakhdar
4 / 6 shared
Mabrouki, Tarek
5 / 22 shared
Bouhalais, Mohamed Lamine
1 / 1 shared
Belhadi, Salim
3 / 6 shared
Khettabi, Riad
1 / 4 shared
Nouioua, Mourad
3 / 3 shared
Meddour, Ikhlas
4 / 4 shared
Chabbi, Amel
2 / 2 shared
Meddour, I.
2 / 2 shared
Mabrouki, T.
1 / 7 shared
Nouioua, M.
2 / 2 shared
Chabbi, A.
2 / 2 shared
Yallese, A.
2 / 2 shared
Athmane, Yallese Mohamed
1 / 5 shared
Tebassi, Hamid
2 / 2 shared
Aouici, Hamdi
2 / 3 shared
Bensouilah, Hamza
4 / 4 shared
Yallese, Mohamed Athman
2 / 2 shared
Berkani, Sofian
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2017
2016
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Berkani, Sofiane
  • Yallese, Mohamed Athmane
  • Bouzid, Lakhdar
  • Mabrouki, Tarek
  • Bouhalais, Mohamed Lamine
  • Belhadi, Salim
  • Khettabi, Riad
  • Nouioua, Mourad
  • Meddour, Ikhlas
  • Chabbi, Amel
  • Meddour, I.
  • Mabrouki, T.
  • Nouioua, M.
  • Chabbi, A.
  • Yallese, A.
  • Athmane, Yallese Mohamed
  • Tebassi, Hamid
  • Aouici, Hamdi
  • Bensouilah, Hamza
  • Yallese, Mohamed Athman
  • Berkani, Sofian
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: A response surface methodology approach

  • Belhadi, Salim
  • Athmane, Yallese Mohamed
  • Tebassi, Hamid
  • Girardin, François
Abstract

Inconel 718 is among difficult to machine materials because of its abrasiveness and high strength even at high temperature.This alloy is mainly used in aircraft and aerospace industries.Therefore, it is very important to reveal and evaluate cutting tools behavior during machining of this kind of alloy.The experimental study presented in this research work has been carried out in order to elucidate surface roughness and productivity mathematical models during turning of Inconel 718 superalloy (35 HRC) with SiC Whisker ceramic tool at various cutting parameters (depth of cut, feed rate, cutting speed and radius nose).A small central composite design (SCCD) including 16 basics runs replicated three times (48 runs), was adopted and graphically evaluated using Fraction of design space (FDS) graph, completed by a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA).Mathematical models for surface roughness and productivity were developed and normality was improved using the Box-Cox transformation.Results show that surface roughness criterion Ra was mainly influenced by cutting speed, radius nose and feed rate, and that the depth of cut had major effect on productivity.Finally, ranges of optimized cutting conditions were proposed for serial industrial production.Industrial benefit was illustrated in terms of high surface quality accompanied with high productivity.Indeed, results show that the use of optimal cutting condition had an industrial benefit to 46.9 % as an improvement in surface quality Ra and 160.54 % in productivity MRR.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • ceramic
  • superalloy