Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Colaço, Fernando

  • Google
  • 2
  • 3
  • 53

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Investigations on quality characteristics in gas tungsten arc welding process using artificial neural network integrated with genetic algorithm53citations
  • 2021Investigations on quality characteristics in gas tungsten arc welding process using artificial neural network integrated with genetic algorithmcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sarfraz, Shoaib
1 / 9 shared
Gupta, Munish
1 / 6 shared
Tomaz, Ítalo
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sarfraz, Shoaib
  • Gupta, Munish
  • Tomaz, Ítalo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Investigations on quality characteristics in gas tungsten arc welding process using artificial neural network integrated with genetic algorithm

  • Sarfraz, Shoaib
  • Colaço, Fernando
  • Gupta, Munish
  • Tomaz, Ítalo
Abstract

as tungsten arc welding (GTAW) technology is widely used in industry and has advantages, including high precision, excellent welding quality, and low equipment cost. However, the inclusion of a large number of process parameters hinders its application on a wider scale. Therefore, there is a need to implement the prediction and optimization models that effectively enhance the process performance of the GTAW process in different applications. In this study, a five-factor five-level central composite design (CCD) matrix was used to conduct GTAW experiments. AISI 1020 steel blank was used as a substrate; UTP AF Ledurit 60 and UTP AF Ledurit 68 were used as the materials of two tubular wires. Further, an artificial neural network (ANN) was used to simulate the GTAW process and then combined with a genetic algorithm (GA) to determine welding parameters that can provide an optimal weld. In welding experiments, five different welding current levels, welding speed, distance to the nozzle, angle of movement, and frequency of the wire feed pulses were used. Using GA, optimal welding parameters were determined: welding current = 222 A, welding speed = 25 cm/min, nozzle deflection distance = 8 mm, travel angle = 25°, wire feed pulse frequency = 8 Hz. The determination coefficient (R 2 ) and RMSE value of all response parameters are satisfactory, and the R 2 of all the data remained higher than 0.65.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • inclusion
  • experiment
  • steel
  • composite
  • tungsten
  • wire