Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ekici, Ergün

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Evaluation of machining characteristics and tool wear during drilling of carbon/aluminium laminated2citations
  • 2022Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Verma, Rajesh
1 / 5 shared
Motorcu, Ali
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Verma, Rajesh
  • Motorcu, Ali
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks

  • Ekici, Ergün
Abstract

<jats:p>In this study, machinability tests were carried out to investigate the effects of control factors (cutting tool geometry, cutting speed, and feed rate) on the surface roughness (Ra), deviation from dimensional accuracy (Da_dev), roundness error (Re) in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V mixed metallic stack and to determine the optimum levels of drilling parameters. The effects of each control factor and their interactions on three quality characteristics were analyzed, and their levels were single-objectively optimized for each component material by the Taguchi method. The material has components (CFRP and Ti6Al4V) with essentially different properties (mechanical, physical, machinability). Single-objective optimization has limited usability as the drilling must be performed in one through both layers. Therefore, in an additional step, the optimum levels of the control factors were determined by optimizing multi-objective with the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Higher Ra, Da_dev, and Re values were obtained on the CFRP component compared to the Ti6Al4V component. The CFRP/Ti6Al4V stack should be drilled with a nano fire coated carbide drill (T3) at medium cutting speed and high feed rate to achieve minimum Ra, Da_dev, and Re values in one go.</jats:p>

Topics
  • surface
  • carbide