People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Reis, Ana
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2023Low- and High-Pressure Casting Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2023Upcycling Aluminium Chips to Powder Feedstocks for Powder Metallurgy Applicationscitations
- 2023Additively Manufactured High-Strength Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2022Damage Evolution Simulations via a Coupled Crystal Plasticity and Cohesive Zone Model for Additively Manufactured Austenitic SS 316L DED Componentscitations
- 2022Tensile Properties of As-Built 18Ni300 Maraging Steel Produced by DEDcitations
- 2022Numerical predictions of orthogonal cutting–induced residual stress of super alloy Inconel 718 considering dynamic recrystallizationcitations
- 2022An Adaptive Thermal Finite Element Simulation of Direct Energy Deposition With Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Frameworkcitations
- 2021Fracture Prediction Based on Evaluation of Initial Porosity Induced By Direct Energy Depositioncitations
- 2021Comparison of the machinability of the 316L and 18Ni300 additively manufactured steels based on turning testscitations
- 2021Numerical-experimental plastic-damage characterisation of additively manufactured 18ni300 maraging steel by means of multiaxial double-notched specimenscitations
- 2021Optimization of Direct Laser Deposition of a Martensitic Steel Powder (Metco 42C) on 42CrMo4 Steelcitations
- 2021An innovation in finite element simulation via crystal plasticity assessment of grain morphology effect on sheet metal formabilitycitations
- 2021Inconel 625/AISI 413 Stainless Steel Functionally Graded Material Produced by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2021Deposition of Nickel-Based Superalloy Claddings on Low Alloy Structural Steel by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2018Characterizing fracture forming limit and shear fracture forming limit for sheet metalscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
booksection
Low- and High-Pressure Casting Aluminum Alloys: A Review
Abstract
<jats:p>Low- pressure casting and high-pressure casting processes are the most common liquid-based technologies used to produce aluminum components. Processing conditions such as cooling rate and pressure level greatly influence the microstructure, mechanical properties, and heat treatment response of the Al alloys produced through these casting techniques. The performance of heat treatment depends on the alloy’s chemical composition and the casting condition such as the vacuum required for high-pressure casting, thus, highlighting the low-pressure casting application that does not require a vacuum. The level of pressure applied to fill the mold cavity can affect the formation of gas porosities and oxide films in the cast. Moreover, mechanical properties are influenced by the microstructure, i.e., secondary dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the morphology of the secondary phases in the α-matrix. Thus, the current study evaluates the most current research developments performed to reduce these defects and to improve the mechanical performance of the casts produced by low- and high-pressure casting.</jats:p>