Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Price, Tristan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019The impact of patient complaints and compliments on medical performance: a systematic reviewcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Baines, R.
1 / 1 shared
Archer, J.
1 / 2 shared
Bryce, Marie
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Baines, R.
  • Archer, J.
  • Bryce, Marie
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The impact of patient complaints and compliments on medical performance: a systematic review

  • Baines, R.
  • Archer, J.
  • Price, Tristan
  • Bryce, Marie
Abstract

Background: Patient complaints and compliments are considered integral to patient safety and quality of care. This review therefore sought to explore the impact of patient complaints and compliments on the medical performance of individual doctors. Method: Database searches were performed in PubMed, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed publications published in the English language between 2007-2017. Data were thematically analysed and synthesised using a modified narrative approach. Impact was assessed using Barr’s (2000) adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model. Results: Of the 355 articles retrieved, 6 were included. One identified a change in measured performance (Kirkpatrick level 3b). Five identified a self-reported change (Kirkpatrick level 3a) in performanceor behaviour. No articles identified a change in the health and wellbeing of patients (Kirkpatrick level 4). Improved patient relations, more thorough documentation, enhanced referral, prescription and testing requests were identified as positive impacts, although such changes may also be detrimental. Other detrimental impacts identified included a break down in patient relations, increased defensive practise, early retirement and altered physical or mental wellbeing. Personal, procedural and cultural factors appeared influential. No articles examining the impact of compliments were identified. Conclusion: Patient complaints can have an impact on medical performance. These can be both positive and negative. The intended purpose of complaints may be undermined by personal, procedural and cultural factors. The fear, language and stigmatisation of complaints should be addressed and the recognition of compliments more actively encouraged. Review findings have implications for those involved in designing and supporting complaint and compliment processes within the broader framework of person-centered care approaches in health systems.

Topics