Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Farias, A.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 7
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Influence of Manufacturing Parameters in Additive Manufacturing SLM-PBF on Residual Stress and Thermal Distortion in Parts of Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V1citations
  • 2024Influence of L-PBF additive manufacturing parameters on the residual stresses and thermal distortions in AISI 316L stainless steel parts1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bordinassi, E. C.
2 / 2 shared
Batalha, G. F.
1 / 2 shared
Miranda, Fabio
1 / 8 shared
Maiolini, A. S. F. R.
1 / 1 shared
Santos, M. O.
2 / 2 shared
Seriacopi, V.
2 / 3 shared
Adamiak, M.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bordinassi, E. C.
  • Batalha, G. F.
  • Miranda, Fabio
  • Maiolini, A. S. F. R.
  • Santos, M. O.
  • Seriacopi, V.
  • Adamiak, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of L-PBF additive manufacturing parameters on the residual stresses and thermal distortions in AISI 316L stainless steel parts

  • Farias, A.
  • Bordinassi, E. C.
  • Adamiak, M.
  • Santos, M. O.
  • Seriacopi, V.
Abstract

<jats:p>The work aimed to numerically model through the Finite Element Method (FEM) the distribution of residual stresses and thermal distortions in parts generated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) in stainless steel AISI 316L and validate the results obtained through experimental measurements on previously manufactured parts.The design methodology followed a numerical approach through the Finite Element Method (FEM), the distribution of residual stresses and thermal distortions in parts generated by Selective Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) in stainless steel AISI 316L and the FEM approach was validated trough the results obtained through experimental measurements on previously manufactured parts. The influence on three levels was verified through complete factorial planning of some manufacturing parameters, such as laser power, speed, and distance between scans (hatch), on the stress and distortion results of the samples and also on the samples simulated by FEM.When results were compared about the average diameters, a relative error of less than 2.5% was observed. The average diameter was influenced by power and speed. Increasing power decreased the average diameter of the samples, while increasing speed and hatch increased the average diameter. When results are compared to measure the residual stresses, it is observed that the relative error was less than 1%. Power, speed, and the hatch itself influenced the residual stress. Increasing power increases residual stress while increasing speed and hatch decreases residual stress. The cooling rate and the transient thermal history are the control factors that influence the residual stresses and are directly related to the process parameters. The computational modelling followed by measurements and calibrations carried out in the experimental stages proved to be efficient and enabled the reproduction of thermal distortion and residual stresses with statistical confidence.Following the research, the aim is to evaluate the prediction of thermal distortions and residual stresses using the machine learning approach. Future research will study heating the building platform, which should also impact residual stresses.Based on the results obtained in this research, it will be possible to select better additive manufacturing parameters for manufacturing 316L stainless steel parts. The parameters evaluated in the work were laser power, scanning speed, and hatch.The innovation of the work lies in the robust simulation of the thermo-elastic behaviour of samples subjected to the additive manufacturing process, where it was possible to accurately relate the thermal distortions and residual stresses that appeared in the samples printed with the parts modelled by the FEM. The numerical-experimental validation makes it possible to extrapolate the studies to several other manufacturing parameters using only computational simulation and work with a more significant amount of data for a prediction study.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • simulation
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • selective laser melting
  • machine learning