People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Debastiani, Rafaela
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (6/6 displayed)
- 2024Impact of viscoelasticity on the stiffness of polymer nanocomposites: insights from experimental and micromechanical model approachescitations
- 2024Dealing with Missing Angular Sections in NanoCT Reconstructions of Low Contrast Polymeric Samples Employing a Mechanical In Situ Loading Stage
- 2023Dealing with missing angular sections in nanoCT reconstructions of low contrast polymeric samples employing a mechanical in situ loading stage
- 2022Correlated study of material interaction between capillary printed eutectic gallium alloys and gold electrodescitations
- 2022Lab-based in situ nanoCT as a tool for the 3D structural and mechanical characterization of metamaterials
- 2022The potentialities of ultrasound as an alternative to chemical etching for proton beam writing micropatterningcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Dealing with missing angular sections in nanoCT reconstructions of low contrast polymeric samples employing a mechanical in situ loading stage
Abstract
While in situ experiments are gaining importance for the (mechanical) assessment ofmetamaterials or materials with complex microstructures, imaging conditions in suchexperiments are often challenging. The lab-based computed tomography system Xradia 810 Ultra allows for the in situ (time lapsed) mechanical testing of samples. However, the in situ loading setup from this system limits the image acquisition angle to 140°. For low contrast polymeric materials, this limited acquisition angle leads to regions of low information gain, thus preventing an accurate reconstruction of the data using a filtered back projection algorithm. Here we demonstrate how the information gain can be improved by selecting an appropriate position of the sample. A low contrast polymeric tetrahedral microlattice sample and a specifically structured sample, both scanned over 140° and 180°, demonstrate that the missing structural details in the 140° reconstruction are limited to an angular wedge of about 20°. Depending on the sample geometry and structure, applying simple strategies for the in situ experiments allows accurate reconstruction of the data. For the tetrahedral microlattice, a simplerotation of the sample by 90° provides enough X-ray absorption for an accurate reconstruction of the geometry.