Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ranjkesh, Bahram

  • Google
  • 7
  • 22
  • 73

Aarhus University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2022Antimicrobial and Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Acrylic Resin Containing Zinc Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Supported on 4A Zeolite10citations
  • 2022Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of orthodontic acrylic resin containing zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles supported on 4A zeolite.10citations
  • 2022Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of orthodontic acrylic resin containing zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles supported on 4A zeolite.10citations
  • 2022Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with single or bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts6citations
  • 2021Effect of different surface treatments of pre-sintered or sintered zirconia on bond strength to dentine4citations
  • 2018In vitro cytotoxic evaluation of novel fast-setting calcium silicate cement compositions and dental materials using colorimetric methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium assay23citations
  • 2018Calcium phosphate precipitation in experimental gaps between fluoride-containing fast-setting calcium silicate cement and dentin10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Azar, Fatemeh Pournaghi
2 / 2 shared
Sefidan, Fatemeh Yeganeh
2 / 2 shared
Divband, Baharak
3 / 5 shared
Esmaeilzadeh, Mahdiyeh
3 / 4 shared
Karimzadeh, Behnaz
1 / 1 shared
Kachoei, Mojgan
3 / 4 shared
Yeganeh Sefidan, Fatemeh
1 / 1 shared
Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
1 / 1 shared
Schurmann, Andreas
1 / 1 shared
Haddadi, Yasser
1 / 1 shared
Krogsgaard, Christian Aalund
1 / 1 shared
Bahrami, Golnosh
2 / 3 shared
Kermanshah, Hamid
1 / 1 shared
Torkamani, Mohammad Javad
1 / 1 shared
Farahmandpour, Negin
1 / 1 shared
Løvschall, Henrik
2 / 2 shared
Isidor, Flemming
2 / 3 shared
Kraft, David Christian Evar
1 / 2 shared
Nyengaard, Jens R.
1 / 1 shared
Chevallier, Jacques
1 / 4 shared
Ding, Ming
1 / 12 shared
Dalstra, Michel
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Azar, Fatemeh Pournaghi
  • Sefidan, Fatemeh Yeganeh
  • Divband, Baharak
  • Esmaeilzadeh, Mahdiyeh
  • Karimzadeh, Behnaz
  • Kachoei, Mojgan
  • Yeganeh Sefidan, Fatemeh
  • Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
  • Schurmann, Andreas
  • Haddadi, Yasser
  • Krogsgaard, Christian Aalund
  • Bahrami, Golnosh
  • Kermanshah, Hamid
  • Torkamani, Mohammad Javad
  • Farahmandpour, Negin
  • Løvschall, Henrik
  • Isidor, Flemming
  • Kraft, David Christian Evar
  • Nyengaard, Jens R.
  • Chevallier, Jacques
  • Ding, Ming
  • Dalstra, Michel
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with single or bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts

  • Schurmann, Andreas
  • Ranjkesh, Bahram
  • Haddadi, Yasser
  • Krogsgaard, Christian Aalund
  • Bahrami, Golnosh
Abstract

<p>Background: To compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with single versus bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts (FRC). Material and Methods: Twenty-four maxillary incisors underwent root canal preparation (1.5-mm-diameter post spaces after canal obturation). Teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n = 12). Two different FRC groups were used for the intracanal post treatment. Single FRC (Rebilda Post system, 1.5 mm diameter) and bundled FRC (Rebilda Post GT, 12 fiber bundles, 1.4 mm diameter) were bonded to the prepared canals using dual-cure resin-based luting cement. Specimens were kept in humid at 37°C for one day. The fracture resistance testing was performed using universal testing machine by applying a compressive static load at a 135° angel to the axis of the teeth. The failure type after fracture was examined by visual inspection. Results: The fracture resistance of teeth with single FRC (Rebilda Post) and bundled FRC (Rebilda Post GT) were 787 ± 156 and 850 ± 166 Newton, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups. Root fracture was the major failure type in both groups. Conclusions: The fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with bundled FRC (Rebilda Post GT) did not differ from incisors with single FRC (Rebilda Post).</p>

Topics
  • glass
  • glass
  • cement
  • resin
  • fiber-reinforced composite