Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mr, Tonetto

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021The impact of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM composites.2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tm, Fernandes
1 / 1 shared
Hass, Viviane
1 / 5 shared
Dy, Sasaki
1 / 1 shared
Sb, Berger
1 / 1 shared
Rm, De Almeida
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tm, Fernandes
  • Hass, Viviane
  • Dy, Sasaki
  • Sb, Berger
  • Rm, De Almeida
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The impact of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM composites.

  • Tm, Fernandes
  • Mr, Tonetto
  • Hass, Viviane
  • Dy, Sasaki
  • Sb, Berger
  • Rm, De Almeida
Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>To investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM composites treated with different surface treatments.<h4>Material and methods</h4>Specimens of two CAD/CAM composites were obtained of Lava Ultimate (LU; n=60) and Brilliant Crios (BC; n=60) which were randomly separated into six subgroups (n=10) according to the surface treatment: control (CTL); sandblasting (SB); sandblasting and silane (SBSL); hydrofluoric acid (HF); hydrofluoric acid and silane (HFSL); and Monobond Etch&Prime (MEP). The mandibular central incisor metal brackets were bonded with a light-cure adhesive. The SBS data were analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance and Turkey's test, while the adhesive remnant index (ARI) by the Kruskal-Wallis, all the significance was set at 5%.<h4>Results</h4>A higher SBS was found for BC in comparison with LU (<i>p</i>< 0.05). All the surface treatments increased the SBS in comparison with CTL (<i>p</i>< 0.0001). Treatment with HF, SBSL and HFSL (<i>p</i>> 0.05) showed a higher SBS, which was followed by MEP and SB (<i>p</i>> 0.05), all in comparison with CTL (<i>p</i>< 0.0001). For ARI, a significant effect was detected only for the surface treatment (<i>p</i>< 0.01), and not for CAD/CAM resin (<i>p</i>> 0.05). Significant differences were detected between CTL to HF, and HF to MEP, as well.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The SBS is highly affected by the surface treatment and also by the CAD/CAM composite. The surface treatment improves the SBS and should be encouraged when orthodontic brackets are bonded to CAD/CAM composites. <b>Key words:</b>CAD/CAM composite resin, brackets, shear bond strength, surface treatment, bonding.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • resin
  • collision-induced dissociation