People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Corney, Jonathan
University of Edinburgh
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (13/13 displayed)
- 2020Process selection methodology for near net shape manufacturingcitations
- 2019A state of the art review of hydroforming technologycitations
- 2018Design and validation of a fixture for positive incremental sheet formingcitations
- 2018Enabling sheet hydroforming to produce smaller radii on aerospace nickel alloyscitations
- 2018Realising the affective potential of patentscitations
- 2017Correlation between von Mises strain and material thinning in a hydroformed sample of Ti35A aerospace grade titaniumcitations
- 2017A methodology for near net shape process feasibility assessmentcitations
- 2017A methodology for assessing the feasibility of producing components by flow formingcitations
- 2016A methodology for assessing the feasibility of producing components by flow forming
- 2016Flow forming
- 2015Assessing the potential benefits of manufacturing gas turbine components by utilizing hydroforming technology
- 2015Systematic process selection for cold forging
- 2015A review of flow forming processes and mechanismscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
A review of flow forming processes and mechanisms
Abstract
<p>After years of purely academic interest and niche applications, today the flow forming process is increasing demand in aerospace, automotive and defense industries. This review surveys academic paper of last fifty years, in order to evaluate the current state-of-the-art for academic and practitioner. Theoretical and experimental approaches are collected and compared by evaluating their prediction models. As a result, several knowledge gaps are identified, for example stress and strain tensors evolutions are not determined for workpiece, due to high computational cost and uncertainty about the correct finite elements approach to adopt. Similarly although, the final microstructure is often evaluated for specific cases, study of its evolution during plastic deformation has not been reported. Residual stress and final material proprieties, such as corrosion behavior, have been not studied numerically or experimentally. Tool path impact and alternative geometries are not deeply explored. Particular attention is given to process experimental optimization and characterization through Design of Experiment, which is still limited to a few papers and sometimes not well developed. The results of this review will help define a research agenda for future developments.</p>