Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kreyca, Johannes

  • Google
  • 4
  • 8
  • 17

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023In-situ XRD investigation of σ phase precipitation kinetics during isothermal holding in a hyper duplex stainless steel6citations
  • 2022Analysis and Modeling of Stress–Strain Curves in Microalloyed Steels Based on a Dislocation Density Evolution Model8citations
  • 2017Flow Stress Modelling and Microstructure Development during Deformation of Metallic Materials2citations
  • 2015Modelling Microstructure Evolution in Polycrystalline Aluminium – Comparison between One- and Multi-Parameter Models with Experiment1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Povoden-Karadeniz, Erwin
2 / 6 shared
Schuster, Roman
1 / 2 shared
Solyom, Laszlo
1 / 1 shared
Jacob, Aurélie
1 / 2 shared
Keplinger, Andreas
1 / 5 shared
Maawad, Emad
1 / 59 shared
Sobotka, Evelyn
1 / 1 shared
Poletti, Maria Cecilia
1 / 79 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2017
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Povoden-Karadeniz, Erwin
  • Schuster, Roman
  • Solyom, Laszlo
  • Jacob, Aurélie
  • Keplinger, Andreas
  • Maawad, Emad
  • Sobotka, Evelyn
  • Poletti, Maria Cecilia
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Modelling Microstructure Evolution in Polycrystalline Aluminium – Comparison between One- and Multi-Parameter Models with Experiment

  • Kreyca, Johannes
Abstract

<jats:p>The plastic response of an aluminium alloy type A6061 is modelled using different state parameter‐based approaches. Several of these models (one‐ and two‐parameter models) have recently been implemented into the thermo‐kinetic software package MatCalc. In the present work, a model based on the Kocks-Mecking-law is used to investigate the capabilities of one and two parameter approaches in order to model experimental data. The experimental work presented here is performed on a Gleeble 1500 thermo‐mechanical simulator for different natural ageing times. We demonstrate that one‐parameter models offer a ready‐to‐use and easy‐to‐calibrate solution for a rough correlation between flow‐curve data and microstructure. Such models describe the evolution of the average dislocation density in time. In many practical cases, a single state parameter is insufficient and multi‐parameter models must be utilized, for instance, with consideration of separate populations of dislocations in walls and subgrain interior. These approaches can consistently represent the deformation behaviour of alloys in a variety of conditions with respect to temperature and strain rates.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • aluminium
  • aluminium alloy
  • dislocation
  • aging