Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Major, Z.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2014Cyclic loading of polyetheretherketone at high tensile stress levels3citations
  • 2012Temperature dependent fracture behavior of Rubbers used in the oil and gas industrycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pinter, Gerald
2 / 67 shared
Constantinescu, D. M.
1 / 1 shared
Berer, M.
1 / 3 shared
Marsavina, L.
1 / 6 shared
Schrittesser, B.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2014
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pinter, Gerald
  • Constantinescu, D. M.
  • Berer, M.
  • Marsavina, L.
  • Schrittesser, B.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Cyclic loading of polyetheretherketone at high tensile stress levels

  • Major, Z.
  • Pinter, Gerald
  • Constantinescu, D. M.
  • Berer, M.
  • Marsavina, L.
Abstract

<p>In a recent study of the corresponding author, it was found that PEEK bearing elements revealed high (irreversible) surface strains if they were loaded between steel sheets. Since this reflects the conditions in the practical application and because the rolling properties are dominated by the surface material, a more detailed analysis of highly strained PEEK was required. Hence, fatigue tests in the high stress tensile regime were conducted. The experiments were carried out on servo-hydraulic testing machines and during the tests the mechanical response of the specimens was recorded. Two material modifications of PEEK were investigated in the research: untreated PEEK (without heat treatment) and annealed PEEK which was modified using defined thermal conditions. The analysis of the recorded test data aimed on the distinction between cumulative material response (creep deformation, material hardening/softening) and spontaneous material response (material hardening/softening). At the highest stress levels, the cumulative response pretended material softening with increasing number of cycles. However, by examining the spontaneous material response which became stiffer with increasing number of cycles, it was shown that the cumulative softening was caused by time-dependent deformation processes.</p>

Topics
  • surface
  • experiment
  • steel
  • fatigue
  • creep